Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

This research presents MOSAIC, a LangGraph-based agentic system designed to automate the annotation of clinical conversations by orchestrating specialized agents for planning, retrieval, and verification. The study demonstrates that this multi-agent architecture significantly outperforms single-task models in adaptability and reliability across rheumatology and OB/GYN domains, achieving an F1 score of 0.928 against human-coded standards.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

An Agentic AI System for Multi-Framework Communication Coding

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2512.08659v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Clinical communication is central to patient outcomes, yet large-scale human annotation of patient-provider conversation remains labor-intensive, inconsistent, and difficult to scale. Existing approaches based on large language models typically rely on single-task models that lack adaptability, interpretability, and reliability, especially when applied across various communication frameworks and clinical domains. In this study, we developed a Multi-framework Structured Agentic AI system for Clinical Communication (MOSAIC), built on a LangGraph-based architecture that orchestrates four core agents, including a Plan Agent for codebook selection and workflow planning, an Update Agent for maintaining up-to-date retrieval databases, a set of Annotation Agents that applies codebook-guided retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) with dynamic few-shot prompting, and a Verification Agent that provides consistency checks and feedback. To evaluate performance, we compared MOSAIC outputs against gold-standard annotations created by trained human coders. We developed and evaluated MOSAIC using 26 gold standard annotated transcripts for training and 50 transcripts for testing, spanning rheumatology and OB/GYN domains. On the test set, MOSAIC achieved an overall F1 score of 0.928. Performance was highest in the Rheumatology subset (F1 = 0.962) and strongest for Patient Behavior (e.g., patients asking questions, expressing preferences, or showing assertiveness). Ablations revealed that MOSAIC outperforms baseline benchmarking.

Authors:Bohao Yang, Rui Yang, Joshua M. Biro, Haoyuan Wang, Jessica L. Handley, Brianna N. Richardson, Sophia Bessias, Nicoleta Economou-Zavlanos, Armando D. Bedoya, Monica Agrawal, Michael M. Zavlanos, Anand Chowdhury, Raj M. Ratwani, Kai Sun, Kathryn I. Pollak, Michael J. Pencina, Chuan Hong

Abstract:Clinical communication is central to patient outcomes, yet large-scale human annotation of patient-provider conversation remains labor-intensive, inconsistent, and difficult to scale. Existing approaches based on large language models typically rely on single-task models that lack adaptability, interpretability, and reliability, especially when applied across various communication frameworks and clinical domains. In this study, we developed a Multi-framework Structured Agentic AI system for Clinical Communication (MOSAIC), built on a LangGraph-based architecture that orchestrates four core agents, including a Plan Agent for codebook selection and workflow planning, an Update Agent for maintaining up-to-date retrieval databases, a set of Annotation Agents that applies codebook-guided retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) with dynamic few-shot prompting, and a Verification Agent that provides consistency checks and feedback. To evaluate performance, we compared MOSAIC outputs against gold-standard annotations created by trained human coders. We developed and evaluated MOSAIC using 26 gold standard annotated transcripts for training and 50 transcripts for testing, spanning rheumatology and OB/GYN domains. On the test set, MOSAIC achieved an overall F1 score of 0.928. Performance was highest in the Rheumatology subset (F1 = 0.962) and strongest for Patient Behavior (e.g., patients asking questions, expressing preferences, or showing assertiveness). Ablations revealed that MOSAIC outperforms baseline benchmarking.

Published in npj Digital Medicine (2026). Code available at this https URL

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2512.08659 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2512.08659v2 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-03314-w DOI(s) linking to related resources

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 273 words

Related coverage