Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces a "quadrature field," a set-equivariant neural network designed to efficiently compute posterior expectations in inverse problems without requiring costly per-observation optimization. By training once on a family of posteriors, the method achieves integration errors that are never worse than standard Monte-Carlo estimates and often improves them by orders of magnitude. This advancement addresses computational bottlenecks in Bayesian inference for applications involving partial differential equations and learned probabilistic models.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Amortized quadrature for posterior expectations in inverse problems

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2606.15871v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Uncertainty in the solution of an inverse problem and in the tasks performed on it is quantified by posterior expectations, each an average of an integrand over $M$ posterior samples. While designed quadratures improve on the $O(M^{-1/2})$ error of Monte-Carlo estimation, they solve an optimization problem, often against the posterior density, for every new observation, which can be computationally costly. To address this limitation, we introduce the quadrature field, a set-equivariant network that maps an observation and its $M$ posterior samples to an $M$-node signed-weight quadrature in one forward pass. Trained once on a family of posteriors to minimize the worst-case integration error over a class of functions, it serves any observation, any $M$ and any integrand in that class with no further optimization. We show that, with high probability and up to a computable slack, the resulting quadrature is never worse than the Monte-Carlo estimate built from the same samples. We validate the quadrature field on closed-form and on learned posteriors, one constrained by a partial differential equation, where it improves on the Monte-Carlo estimate in median at every node count, often by orders of magnitude.

Abstract:Uncertainty in the solution of an inverse problem and in the tasks performed on it is quantified by posterior expectations, each an average of an integrand over $M$ posterior samples. While designed quadratures improve on the $O(M^{-1/2})$ error of Monte-Carlo estimation, they solve an optimization problem, often against the posterior density, for every new observation, which can be computationally costly. To address this limitation, we introduce the quadrature field, a set-equivariant network that maps an observation and its $M$ posterior samples to an $M$-node signed-weight quadrature in one forward pass. Trained once on a family of posteriors to minimize the worst-case integration error over a class of functions, it serves any observation, any $M$ and any integrand in that class with no further optimization. We show that, with high probability and up to a computable slack, the resulting quadrature is never worse than the Monte-Carlo estimate built from the same samples. We validate the quadrature field on closed-form and on learned posteriors, one constrained by a partial differential equation, where it improves on the Monte-Carlo estimate in median at every node count, often by orders of magnitude.

Computation (stat.CO); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)

arXiv:2606.15871 [stat.CO]

(or arXiv:2606.15871v2 [stat.CO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.15871 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 284 words

Related coverage