aiqbench analysis
This research formalizes the statistical challenges of "Always-On" experimentation environments where generative AI continuously generates and deploys new treatments. By developing sequential tests with time-uniform error control, the authors provide a rigorous framework for managing dynamic model updates without inflating false discovery rates. This work directly addresses the growing need for robust evaluation methods in high-velocity AI-driven decision-making systems.
Always-On Experimentation
arXiv:2609.38695v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative AI has dramatically accelerated the rate at which new treatments---from novel pharmaceuticals to online marketing campaigns---can be conceived and deployed. As a result, modern experimentation platforms often run continuously, with treatments added as they are ready and removed when they underperform. We formalize this "Always-On" experimental setting, in which treatments can be dynamically generated, added to, and removed from a running experiment, and study the statistical problem of deciding whether to accept or reject each treatment while controlling for the false discovery rate. We develop sequential tests that achieve time-uniform Type-I error control under arbitrary stopping times and "predictable" treatment schedules. Our approach builds on the testing-by-betting framework: we construct test supermartingales for testing the average treatment effect of each treatment, and show that the construction of these test supermartingales is growth-rate optimal in an almost-sure sense.
Abstract:Generative AI has dramatically accelerated the rate at which new treatments---from novel pharmaceuticals to online marketing campaigns---can be conceived and deployed. As a result, modern experimentation platforms often run continuously, with treatments added as they are ready and removed when they underperform. We formalize this "Always-On" experimental setting, in which treatments can be dynamically generated, added to, and removed from a running experiment, and study the statistical problem of deciding whether to accept or reject each treatment while controlling for the false discovery rate. We develop sequential tests that achieve time-uniform Type-I error control under arbitrary stopping times and "predictable" treatment schedules. Our approach builds on the testing-by-betting framework: we construct test supermartingales for testing the average treatment effect of each treatment, and show that the construction of these test supermartingales is growth-rate optimal in an almost-sure sense.
Methodology (stat.ME); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.38695 [stat.ME]
(or arXiv:2609.38695v1 [stat.ME] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.38695 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 234 words
Related coverage
Synthesis Superintelligence: from Semiconductors to Superconductors — Periodic Labs’ Liam Fedus and Ekin Dogus Cubuk
Latent Space · Oct 8, 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026

Quantum Networks Benefit From Stabilized, “On Demand” Entanglement
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jul 14, 2026
The Continual Constitutional Convention: How language models revise the documents that govern them
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 13, 2026