aiqbench analysis
This research demonstrates that high-fidelity physics simulation is not strictly necessary for transferring learned control policies to real-world underwater robots, provided the controller incorporates specific constraints like band-limited trajectory generation. By utilizing a simplified, stateless fluid model, the study achieves successful sim-to-real transfer for complex tasks such as disturbance rejection and target tracking without requiring hardware tuning. The work shifts the burden of physical accuracy from the simulator to the controller architecture, offering a cost-effective path for deploying soft robotic systems in dynamic environments.
All You Need Is Low Fidelity: Zero-Shot Sim-to-Real of Learned Robotic Fish Control
arXiv:2609.36993v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Complex tasks for underwater robots remain limited by the capabilities of their controllers. Learning a better one for a soft, underactuated robotic fish trades simulator cost against fidelity. We show that an intentionally low-fidelity simulator is enough: a stateless, quasi-steady fluid model with no wake and no added-mass history suffices to learn a \emph{general}, closed-loop controller that transfers to hardware without tuning. Our platform is a soft, single-motor, tendon-driven fish whose policy observes only what the hardware can measure. A staged pipeline grounds the simulator in two independent identifications, fixing the tail dynamics and a stateless fluid model; the policy then acts through a band-limited rhythmic trajectory generator rather than commanding the tail directly. Deployed unchanged in an outdoor pool, a single policy performs closed-loop target reaching, disturbance rejection, and out-of-distribution target acquisition and tracking. The transfer rests on the constraint rather than the fidelity: the generator cannot leave the band over which the fluid was identified. This raises the question of how much of the physics can reside in the controller rather than in the simulator.
Abstract:Complex tasks for underwater robots remain limited by the capabilities of their controllers. Learning a better one for a soft, underactuated robotic fish trades simulator cost against fidelity. We show that an intentionally low-fidelity simulator is enough: a stateless, quasi-steady fluid model with no wake and no added-mass history suffices to learn a \emph{general}, closed-loop controller that transfers to hardware without tuning. Our platform is a soft, single-motor, tendon-driven fish whose policy observes only what the hardware can measure. A staged pipeline grounds the simulator in two independent identifications, fixing the tail dynamics and a stateless fluid model; the policy then acts through a band-limited rhythmic trajectory generator rather than commanding the tail directly. Deployed unchanged in an outdoor pool, a single policy performs closed-loop target reaching, disturbance rejection, and out-of-distribution target acquisition and tracking. The transfer rests on the constraint rather than the fidelity: the generator cannot leave the band over which the fluid was identified. This raises the question of how much of the physics can reside in the controller rather than in the simulator.
8 pages, 10 figures, submitted to ICRA 2027. Liam Maloney and Simon Ramchandani contributed equally
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2609.36993 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2609.36993v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.36993 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 285 words
Related coverage

Runway’s WorldPrompt and the Engineering of Real-Time Worlds
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026
[AINews] Modal’s $1B ARR, $16B Series D makes it NYC’s newest AI Infra Decacorn, 3x usage and 3x valuation in 5 months, 15x in 1 yr
Latent Space · Oct 15, 2026
How bad would it be if GPS satellites were shot down?
LessWrong · Jun 12, 2026
Dyna-2: General Purpose Physical Agents with Hour-Long Autonomy — Jason Ma, Dyna Robotics
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026