Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research establishes a theoretical framework demonstrating how ensembling strategies via averaging can provide robust stability guarantees against various data perturbations. By quantifying these effects through the norm of a covariance operator, the study offers sharper insights than traditional privacy-based approaches for ensuring algorithmic resilience.
Sources coveringarXiv, Quantum Zeitgeist
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Algorithmic stability via ensembling

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.10428v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Algorithmic stability refers to the property of an algorithm being insensitive to perturbations of the input data, where the type of perturbation may vary depending on the setting. In this work, we develop a general framework to quantify the extent to which any ensembling strategy defined via averaging can yield stability guarantees for any type of data perturbation. Our main theoretical result is a guarantee on the stability of this ensembled algorithm, given in terms of the norm of a certain covariance operator that describes the ensembling process. We show how our general framework yields interpretable and intuitive insights in several examples of perturbations of practical interest, and provides much sharper guarantees than those obtained from privacy considerations.

Abstract:Algorithmic stability refers to the property of an algorithm being insensitive to perturbations of the input data, where the type of perturbation may vary depending on the setting. In this work, we develop a general framework to quantify the extent to which any ensembling strategy defined via averaging can yield stability guarantees for any type of data perturbation. Our main theoretical result is a guarantee on the stability of this ensembled algorithm, given in terms of the norm of a certain covariance operator that describes the ensembling process. We show how our general framework yields interpretable and intuitive insights in several examples of perturbations of practical interest, and provides much sharper guarantees than those obtained from privacy considerations.

Statistics Theory (math.ST); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2609.10428 [math.ST]

(or arXiv:2609.10428v1 [math.ST] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.10428 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 215 words

Related coverage