Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces AGVF, a multi-agent framework that treats medical-necessity appeal generation as a Constrained Markov Decision Process to strictly enforce policy and evidence constraints. By integrating an adversarial critique agent and a deterministic citation-grounding gate, the system eliminates unsupported clinical assertions while maintaining logical structure in hierarchical payer policies. The study validates this architecture on synthetic data, demonstrating that removing the safety gates causes a complete failure in adherence to evidence requirements.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Agentic Governance and Adversarial Verification for Policy-Constrained LLM Healthcare Appeal Generation

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.27844v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Claim denial management costs U.S. healthcare approximately $260 billion annually in administrative overhead. Large Language Models (LLMs) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) can produce fluent clinical text, but single-agent architectures fail in high-stakes healthcare: they introduce unsupported clinical details and lose the logical structure of hierarchical payer policy. We propose AGVF (Agentic Governance and Adversarial Verification Framework), a multi-agent architecture for medical-necessity appeal generation under explicit policy and evidence constraints. AGVF models appeal synthesis as a Constrained Markov Decision Process (CMDP) over five agents: policy formalization, evidence retrieval, gap analysis, adversarial critique, and gated synthesis. We prove that refinement over a fixed policy constraint graph monotonically reduces evidence-deficiency and terminates with either a complete satisfying frontier or a localized evidence gap. A deterministic citation- grounding gate prevents assertions without admissible evidence from entering shared state. We provide a reference implementation and validate it on 1,000 synthetic appeal cases parameterized from de-identified public hospital discharge data. The validation confirms zero citation-grounding violations across all AGVF cases and monotone deficiency reduction in every episode; ablating the gate raises violations to 100%, confirming it is load-bearing. The study uses no real patient records and does not measure clinical efficacy. AGVF thus contributes a theory-backed agentic architecture and verified reference implementation for policy-constrained LLM generation in healthcare.

Abstract:Claim denial management costs U.S. healthcare approximately $260 billion annually in administrative overhead. Large Language Models (LLMs) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) can produce fluent clinical text, but single-agent architectures fail in high-stakes healthcare: they introduce unsupported clinical details and lose the logical structure of hierarchical payer policy. We propose AGVF (Agentic Governance and Adversarial Verification Framework), a multi-agent architecture for medical-necessity appeal generation under explicit policy and evidence constraints. AGVF models appeal synthesis as a Constrained Markov Decision Process (CMDP) over five agents: policy formalization, evidence retrieval, gap analysis, adversarial critique, and gated synthesis. We prove that refinement over a fixed policy constraint graph monotonically reduces evidence-deficiency and terminates with either a complete satisfying frontier or a localized evidence gap. A deterministic citation- grounding gate prevents assertions without admissible evidence from entering shared state. We provide a reference implementation and validate it on 1,000 synthetic appeal cases parameterized from de-identified public hospital discharge data. The validation confirms zero citation-grounding violations across all AGVF cases and monotone deficiency reduction in every episode; ablating the gate raises violations to 100%, confirming it is load-bearing. The study uses no real patient records and does not measure clinical efficacy. AGVF thus contributes a theory-backed agentic architecture and verified reference implementation for policy-constrained LLM generation in healthcare.

18 pages, 7 figures. This manuscript is under review at ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST)

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)

I.2.11; I.2.7; J.3

arXiv:2609.27844 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2609.27844v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.27844 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 337 words

Related coverage