aiqbench analysis
This survey outlines a critical paradigm shift in agentic systems, moving from isolated skill creation toward automated, evaluation-driven evolution. By categorizing four distinct evolution paradigms and analyzing benchmark gaps, the work provides a roadmap for building generalizable and verifiably safe skill ecosystems. TechPulse take:
Agent Skill Evaluation and Evolution: Frameworks and Benchmarks
arXiv:2606.11435v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The growth of agent skills has transformed how agentic systems are built, evaluated, and deployed. As skill libraries continue to scale, rigorous evaluation becomes critical to ensuring their utility, quality, and safety in real-world applications. Consequently, the field is undergoing an emerging paradigm shift from isolated skill creation to automated, evaluation-driven skill evolution. In this survey, we systematically examine the landscape of skill evolution and evaluation beyond foundational skill creation. We categorize evolution into four distinct paradigms, spanning execution feedback, trajectory distillation, compression, and reinforcement learning, showing how each element contributes to improving skill utility and reliability. We also provide an analysis of six skill-centric benchmark categories, identifying structural gaps in benchmark coverage, trade-offs, and metric richness to advance skill research. Finally, we identify open directions for building skill ecosystems that are generalizable, efficient, and verifiably safe. The project URL is https://github.com/Cassie07/AgentSkill_Survey
Abstract:The growth of agent skills has transformed how agentic systems are built, evaluated, and deployed. As skill libraries continue to scale, rigorous evaluation becomes critical to ensuring their utility, quality, and safety in real-world applications. Consequently, the field is undergoing an emerging paradigm shift from isolated skill creation to automated, evaluation-driven skill evolution. In this survey, we systematically examine the landscape of skill evolution and evaluation beyond foundational skill creation. We categorize evolution into four distinct paradigms, spanning execution feedback, trajectory distillation, compression, and reinforcement learning, showing how each element contributes to improving skill utility and reliability. We also provide an analysis of six skill-centric benchmark categories, identifying structural gaps in benchmark coverage, trade-offs, and metric richness to advance skill research. Finally, we identify open directions for building skill ecosystems that are generalizable, efficient, and verifiably safe. The project URL is this https URL
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2606.11435 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2606.11435v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.11435 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 239 words
Related coverage
EvoSkill Injection: Red-Teaming Autonomous Skill Generation and Evolution in Self-Evolving Agents
arXiv · Sep 1, 2026

GEAK V3: Agent-Driven, Repository-Level GPU Kernel Optimization across HIP, Triton, and FlyDSL on AMD GPUs
AMD · Jul 20, 2026
When Non-Adversarial Noise Hurts Learning: Benchmarking Skill Self-Evolution in Agents
arXiv · Oct 15, 2026
Rethinking Self-Evolving Agent Skills: Feedback Dynamics over Multiple Rounds
arXiv · Aug 5, 2026