aiqbench analysis
This paper provides the first systems-level characterization of agent memory, offering a crucial taxonomy and cost profiling for LLM agents handling long-horizon tasks. By benchmarking ten representative systems, it reveals how specific design choices impact write/read path costs and delivers actionable recommendations for fleet-scale management. This research is essential for engineers building scalable, stateful AI agents that must persistently reason over extended interaction histories.
Agent Memory: Characterization and System Implications of Stateful Long-Horizon Workloads
arXiv:2606.06448v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: LLM agents are increasingly deployed on long-horizon tasks requiring sustained reasoning over extended interaction histories. Realizing this at scale requires agents to persistently store, retrieve, and update their own memory across sessions. A rich ecosystem of agent memory systems has emerged spanning flat retrieval, LLM-mediated extraction, consolidating fact stores, and agentic control flows. Yet, their system-level behavior remains uncharacterized. We present the first systems characterization of agent memory. First, we introduce a system-oriented taxonomy classifying agent memory systems along four axes. Second, we build a phase-aware profiling harness attributing cost to construction, retrieval, and generation. Third, we characterize ten representative systems across two benchmark suites, uncovering how design choices shift cost across the write and read paths. Finally, we derive 10 system recommendations covering construction scheduling, capability floors, amortization via query volume, freshness-latency tradeoffs, and fleet-scale management.
Abstract:LLM agents are increasingly deployed on long-horizon tasks requiring sustained reasoning over extended interaction histories. Realizing this at scale requires agents to persistently store, retrieve, and update their own memory across sessions. A rich ecosystem of agent memory systems has emerged spanning flat retrieval, LLM-mediated extraction, consolidating fact stores, and agentic control flows. Yet, their system-level behavior remains uncharacterized. We present the first systems characterization of agent memory. First, we introduce a system-oriented taxonomy classifying agent memory systems along four axes. Second, we build a phase-aware profiling harness attributing cost to construction, retrieval, and generation. Third, we characterize ten representative systems across two benchmark suites, uncovering how design choices shift cost across the write and read paths. Finally, we derive 10 system recommendations covering construction scheduling, capability floors, amortization via query volume, freshness-latency tradeoffs, and fleet-scale management.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2606.06448 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2606.06448v2 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.06448 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 229 words
Related coverage

[AINews] Opus 5.5 is good at explainer videos
Latent Space · Sep 29, 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026

[AINews] The Future of Latent Space
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 10, 2026