Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This paper studies whether a "student" model can improve its emotion-cause pair extraction by selectively querying an "expert" for judgments on borderline cases. At a 10% query rate, selective fusion raised mean pair F1 by 2.64 to 3.88 points, but the authors also find that more access does not always improve cause identification. For AI readers, the practical lesson is that the choice of which cases to query and how to integrate the answers matters more than query volume alone, though the gains are modest and limited to one benchmark family.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Agent-Guided Evidence Acquisition for Emotion-Cause Pair Extraction

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.14886v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Emotion-Cause Pair Extraction (ECPE) requires identifying the causes associated with emotions expressed in a conversation. Accurate extraction can depend on evidence that is not initially available, making it important to decide when further information is worth acquiring. We study agent-guided evidence acquisition for ECPE, where a student agent selectively accesses expert judgments for borderline relations on both sides of its validation-selected F1 decision boundary and revises only queried predictions. Through controlled comparisons under different information-access conditions, we examine how delegation granularity, query selection, and response integration affect prediction quality. At a nominal 10% query rate, selective fusion improves mean pair F1 by 2.64-3.88 points over the student in our main experiments, reaching 65.14 on ECF and 49.74 on MEC4 across model families. Our analysis suggests that greater access does not always translate into better cause identification. These findings motivate acquisition strategies that consider both the relevance of newly available evidence and its effect on prediction revision, providing an empirical basis for more effective and efficient evidence acquisition in ECPE.

Abstract:Emotion-Cause Pair Extraction (ECPE) requires identifying the causes associated with emotions expressed in a conversation. Accurate extraction can depend on evidence that is not initially available, making it important to decide when further information is worth acquiring. We study agent-guided evidence acquisition for ECPE, where a student agent selectively accesses expert judgments for borderline relations on both sides of its validation-selected F1 decision boundary and revises only queried predictions. Through controlled comparisons under different information-access conditions, we examine how delegation granularity, query selection, and response integration affect prediction quality. At a nominal 10% query rate, selective fusion improves mean pair F1 by 2.64-3.88 points over the student in our main experiments, reaching 65.14 on ECF and 49.74 on MEC4 across model families. Our analysis suggests that greater access does not always translate into better cause identification. These findings motivate acquisition strategies that consider both the relevance of newly available evidence and its effect on prediction revision, providing an empirical basis for more effective and efficient evidence acquisition in ECPE.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2610.14886 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.14886v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.14886 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 264 words

Related coverage