aiqbench analysis
This paper advances foundational quantum theory by proposing "operational eternalism," which resolves tensions between indefinite causality and dynamical spacetime physics through a perspectival definition of observers within the global Hilbert space. By redefining how input-output data is grouped, the authors suggest that apparent non-causality can be eliminated without relying on external classical assumptions about agents. These insights are critical for researchers developing higher-order quantum theories where the nature of observation and causality remain central to theoretical consistency.
Agency under indefinite causality: operational eternalism in higher-order quantum theory
arXiv:2512.22879v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: After two decades of research on indefinite causality, a conceptual lesson emerges: the tension between operational quantum theory and dynamical spacetime physics requires observers, or agents, to be defined within the theory itself. Agents arise from admissible groupings of input and output data in a global Hilbert space, and redefining these groupings may eliminate non-causality. Agency is perspectival: from Alice's perspective, Bob may fail to qualify as an observer, and vice versa. We interpret these results through an \emph{operational eternalism}, a stance analogous to the block-universe view but applied to information rather than geometry. Observers are thus well-defined in the global eternalist picture, but they are not universal across local perspectives.
Abstract:After two decades of research on indefinite causality, a conceptual lesson emerges: the tension between operational quantum theory and dynamical spacetime physics requires observers, or agents, to be defined within the theory itself. Agents arise from admissible groupings of input and output data in a global Hilbert space, and redefining these groupings may eliminate non-causality. Agency is perspectival: from Alice's perspective, Bob may fail to qualify as an observer, and vice versa. We interpret these results through an \emph{operational eternalism}, a stance analogous to the block-universe view but applied to information rather than geometry. Observers are thus well-defined in the global eternalist picture, but they are not universal across local perspectives.
arXiv:2512.22879 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2512.22879v2 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.22879 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 200 words
Related coverage

LiveLaw Supreme Court Half-Yearly Digest: January - June 2026 [Part 2]
livelaw.in · Sep 13, 2026

Time symmetry in quantum theories and beyond
Quantum Journal · Sep 30, 2026
Distilling Unitary Operations: A No-Go Theorem and Minimal Realization
arXiv · Jun 10, 2026
Somewhat Contra Ted Chiang on AI Consciousness
LessWrong · Jun 13, 2026