aiqbench analysis
This arXiv position paper argues that agentic AI, meaning persistent systems that pursue goals under bounded resources, should be treated as a systems-level abstraction and not just a foundation-model application. It attributes recurring failures such as runaway resource use, prompt-injection-style hijacking, and opaque continuous operation to structural gaps across execution, interfaces, correctness, oversight, coordination, and persistence. The paper is a framing argument rather than an empirical result, so its value for AI and systems readers depends on whether these proposed abstractions lead to concrete designs and measurable improvements.
Agency as a New Organizing Abstraction for Computer Science
arXiv:2610.17410v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Advances in large-scale machine learning have enabled agentic AI systems: persistent, autonomous computational entities that pursue goals, initiate actions, and interact with open environments. These systems are often framed as applications of foundation models. We argue that this framing is incomplete: agency is also a candidate new organizing abstraction for computer science. What is new is not the concept of an agent, nor runtime policy generation per se, but its general-purpose, open-ended form, in which systems can synthesize courses of action from goals, observations, and memory, over tools and environments for which no complete task-specific model was specified in advance. Thus agency becomes a systems-level abstraction as well as an AI modeling concept. Where the process abstraction organizes computation around executing programs, agency organizes it around pursuing goals under bounded resources: a process executes a program; an agent pursues a goal. From this perspective, the recurring failures of deployed agentic systems (runaway resource consumption, behavior redirected by adversarial content, opaque continuous operation) are symptoms of structural abstraction gaps, not isolated engineering defects. We examine these gaps across six dimensions (execution, interfaces, correctness, oversight, coordination, and persistence) and argue that closing them requires coordinated advances in systems,
Abstract:Advances in large-scale machine learning have enabled agentic AI systems: persistent, autonomous computational entities that pursue goals, initiate actions, and interact with open environments. These systems are often framed as applications of foundation models. We argue that this framing is incomplete: agency is also a candidate new organizing abstraction for computer science. What is new is not the concept of an agent, nor runtime policy generation per se, but its general-purpose, open-ended form, in which systems can synthesize courses of action from goals, observations, and memory, over tools and environments for which no complete task-specific model was specified in advance. Thus agency becomes a systems-level abstraction as well as an AI modeling concept. Where the process abstraction organizes computation around executing programs, agency organizes it around pursuing goals under bounded resources: a process executes a program; an agent pursues a goal. From this perspective, the recurring failures of deployed agentic systems (runaway resource consumption, behavior redirected by adversarial content, opaque continuous operation) are symptoms of structural abstraction gaps, not isolated engineering defects. We examine these gaps across six dimensions (execution, interfaces, correctness, oversight, coordination, and persistence) and argue that closing them requires coordinated advances in systems,
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)
arXiv:2610.17410 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.17410v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.17410 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 302 words
Related coverage

The Alignment Journal: Organization, Personnel, and Scope
AI Alignment Forum · Sep 1, 2026
News Archive 2026
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026
Synthesis Superintelligence: from Semiconductors to Superconductors — Periodic Labs’ Liam Fedus and Ekin Dogus Cubuk
Latent Space · Oct 8, 2026

Why I Left Google DeepMind
LessWrong · Jul 15, 2026