Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This paper presents a fundamental no-go theorem in quantum foundations, demonstrating the inherent tension between topological robustness and subsystem structure within probability-based representations of quantum states. The findings challenge generalized probabilistic frameworks by proving that preserving state closeness inevitably sacrifices other essential structural properties required for useful physical statements. This theoretical result is significant for researchers developing rigorous mathematical models for quantum information processing rather than offering immediate product applications or policy implications.
Sources coveringarXiv, Latent Space

Against probability: A quantum state is more than a list of probability distributions

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2601.18872v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The state of a quantum system can be represented by listing the outcome probabilities for a tomographically complete set of measurements. Such representations appear throughout physics, for example, in quantum field theory via correlation functions and in quantum foundations within generalized probabilistic frameworks. In this paper, we show a no-go result: To enable useful statements, the probability representation must be topologically robust$\unicode{x2014}$preserving the notion of closeness between states. Yet, a topologically robust probability representation cannot simultaneously retain other essential structure, such as the subsystem structure.

Abstract:The state of a quantum system can be represented by listing the outcome probabilities for a tomographically complete set of measurements. Such representations appear throughout physics, for example, in quantum field theory via correlation functions and in quantum foundations within generalized probabilistic frameworks. In this paper, we show a no-go result: To enable useful statements, the probability representation must be topologically robust$\unicode{x2014}$preserving the notion of closeness between states. Yet, a topologically robust probability representation cannot simultaneously retain other essential structure, such as the subsystem structure.

arXiv:2601.18872 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2601.18872v2 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.18872 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 174 words

Related coverage