aiqbench analysis
This research establishes a rigorous geometric framework for quantifying "magic" in codeword-stabilized quantum codes by reducing complex quantum optimization problems to classical affine-incidence tasks. By converting the stabilizer threshold into a finite-geometric problem, the study provides fixed-parameter algorithms and analytic lower bounds that clarify how nonlinear word sets generate certifiable non-stabilizer resources. These advances offer concrete tools for analyzing error-correcting code structures essential for fault-tolerant quantum computing architectures.
Affine-Profile Stabilizer Thresholds for Magic in Codeword-Stabilized Quantum Codes
arXiv:2608.25414v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Codeword-stabilized quantum codes give a unified graph-state description of stabilizer and nonadditive quantum error-correcting codes. Although each individual CWS word state is stabilizer, coherent superpositions of different word states can be nonstabilizer. We develop a CWS-adapted magic-witness framework that isolates this codeword coherence and converts it into certified lower bounds on robustness of magic. The main result is an exact reduction of the stabilizer threshold of a natural CWS coherence witness to a finite-geometric problem over the classical CWS word set. For general weighted superpositions, the threshold is computed by enumerating affine intersections and affine-quadratic phases. For equal-weight superpositions, the phase optimization collapses, and the threshold is determined entirely by how many CWS words can lie in affine flats of each dimension. Thus a quantum optimization over stabilizer states becomes a classical affine-incidence problem. This reduction yields a fixed-parameter algorithm, an analytic lower bound for an infinite union-stabilizer family, and exact rational certificates for several standard nonadditive CWS examples. The framework also clarifies why exact enumeration fails for large structured families and identifies the remaining task as an affine-intersection problem. The result provides a geometric mechanism by which nonlinear CWS word sets generate certifiable magic.
Abstract:Codeword-stabilized quantum codes give a unified graph-state description of stabilizer and nonadditive quantum error-correcting codes. Although each individual CWS word state is stabilizer, coherent superpositions of different word states can be nonstabilizer. We develop a CWS-adapted magic-witness framework that isolates this codeword coherence and converts it into certified lower bounds on robustness of magic. The main result is an exact reduction of the stabilizer threshold of a natural CWS coherence witness to a finite-geometric problem over the classical CWS word set. For general weighted superpositions, the threshold is computed by enumerating affine intersections and affine-quadratic phases. For equal-weight superpositions, the phase optimization collapses, and the threshold is determined entirely by how many CWS words can lie in affine flats of each dimension. Thus a quantum optimization over stabilizer states becomes a classical affine-incidence problem. This reduction yields a fixed-parameter algorithm, an analytic lower bound for an infinite union-stabilizer family, and exact rational certificates for several standard nonadditive CWS examples. The framework also clarifies why exact enumeration fails for large structured families and identifies the remaining task as an affine-intersection problem. The result provides a geometric mechanism by which nonlinear CWS word sets generate certifiable magic.
arXiv:2608.25414 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2608.25414v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.25414 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 286 words
Related coverage

What is Quantum Error Correction? Complete 2026 Beginner’s Guide
Quantum Zeitgeist · May 29, 2026

Magic state distillation falters with noisy quantum measurements
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 22, 2026

Heuristic and Optimal Synthesis of CNOT and Clifford Circuits
Quantum Journal · Sep 21, 2026
Fragility of Magic State Distillation under Imperfect Measurements
arXiv · Sep 16, 2026