Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

This research advances AI safety and robustness by developing adversarial frameworks to stress-test outlier detection in subjective image quality assessment, ensuring Mean Opinion Scores remain reliable against optimized attacks. The study identifies vulnerabilities in current methods and proposes low-complexity alternatives that maintain accuracy under worst-case scenarios, directly addressing the integrity of human-in-the-loop evaluation systems.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Adversarial Stress Testing of Outlier Detection in Subjective Image Quality Assessment

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2509.06554v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In subjective image and video quality assessment, observers rate or compare selected stimuli. Before calculating mean opinion scores (MOSs), unreliable ratings should be identified and handled as outliers. Several outlier-detection methods are available, including standardized procedures, but their comparative performance is often evaluated using only specific types of synthetic outliers such as random clickers. Such tests do not necessarily reveal the worst-case behavior of these methods. To address this gap, we introduce and demonstrate a general empirical worst-case framework for outlier-detection methods, with proof-of-concept adversarial attack generators for both discrete absolute category and continuous visual analog scale ratings. The attacks use optimization algorithms to identify ratings that maximize the discrepancy between the resulting MOS estimates and the ground truth. We apply the proposed framework to several hard and soft outlier-detection methods and demonstrate substantial differences in their worst-case reconstruction performance under adversarial stress. We also propose several low-complexity outlier-detection methods that achieve excellent empirical worst-case performance.

Abstract:In subjective image and video quality assessment, observers rate or compare selected stimuli. Before calculating mean opinion scores (MOSs), unreliable ratings should be identified and handled as outliers. Several outlier-detection methods are available, including standardized procedures, but their comparative performance is often evaluated using only specific types of synthetic outliers such as random clickers. Such tests do not necessarily reveal the worst-case behavior of these methods. To address this gap, we introduce and demonstrate a general empirical worst-case framework for outlier-detection methods, with proof-of-concept adversarial attack generators for both discrete absolute category and continuous visual analog scale ratings. The attacks use optimization algorithms to identify ratings that maximize the discrepancy between the resulting MOS estimates and the ground truth. We apply the proposed framework to several hard and soft outlier-detection methods and demonstrate substantial differences in their worst-case reconstruction performance under adversarial stress. We also propose several low-complexity outlier-detection methods that achieve excellent empirical worst-case performance.

12 Pages, 5 figures. Extended version of the "Robustness and accuracy of mean opinion scores with hard and soft outlier detection" of D. Saupe and T. Bleile, 17th International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX'25)

Image and Video Processing (eess.IV); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Multimedia (cs.MM)

arXiv:2509.06554 [eess.IV]

(or arXiv:2509.06554v2 [eess.IV] for this version)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 210 words

Related coverage