aiqbench analysis
This research demonstrates that entangled measurement strategies offer a polynomial sample complexity advantage over single-copy learning rules in quantum PAC learning scenarios. The study proves that local operations and classical communication (LOCC) can be asymptotically suboptimal for selecting measurements that minimize prediction error on new quantum states. These findings highlight the critical role of non-local correlations in optimizing data-driven tasks within quantum machine learning frameworks.
Advantage of Entangled Learning Rules in Quantum Measurement Class Learning
arXiv:2610.07328v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Learning with data in the form of quantum states is of current interest and has led to a variety of problems that boil down to interaction with the available data via quantum measurement and classical post-processing of observed classical outcomes. In quantum measurement PAC learning, one is given a sequence of unknown, prepared quantum states and classical labels, along with a hypothesis class of candidate measurements. The task is to select a measurement from the hypothesis class that minimizes a fixed notion of error in prediction of the classical labels via measurement of a new state by the selected hypothesis. In this work, we consider the advantage of interacting with the given data in the measurement learning framework using learning rules given by measurements that cannot be implemented using local operations and classical communication (LOCC), as opposed to single-copy learning rules. We provide a construction showing that there exist learning scenarios wherein single-copy learning rules are asymptotically suboptimal compared to optimal ones. We then show that learning rules based on entangled measurements enjoy at most a polynomial sample complexity advantage over single-copy learning rules in the PAC learning setting (under a natural joint measurability covering assumption).
Abstract:Learning with data in the form of quantum states is of current interest and has led to a variety of problems that boil down to interaction with the available data via quantum measurement and classical post-processing of observed classical outcomes. In quantum measurement PAC learning, one is given a sequence of unknown, prepared quantum states and classical labels, along with a hypothesis class of candidate measurements. The task is to select a measurement from the hypothesis class that minimizes a fixed notion of error in prediction of the classical labels via measurement of a new state by the selected hypothesis. In this work, we consider the advantage of interacting with the given data in the measurement learning framework using learning rules given by measurements that cannot be implemented using local operations and classical communication (LOCC), as opposed to single-copy learning rules. We provide a construction showing that there exist learning scenarios wherein single-copy learning rules are asymptotically suboptimal compared to optimal ones. We then show that learning rules based on entangled measurements enjoy at most a polynomial sample complexity advantage over single-copy learning rules in the PAC learning setting (under a natural joint measurability covering assumption).
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.07328 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2610.07328v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.07328 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 293 words
Related coverage

Quantum Computing Myths and Reality
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 30, 2026

NISQ, What Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum Means
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 30, 2026

Quantum Machine-Learning Design Targets Training And Scaling Barriers
The Quantum Insider · Jul 28, 2026

Hybrid Quantum Networks Lift Fraud Detection Accuracy to 85%
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 4, 2026