aiqbench analysis
This paper tackles the "selection problem" in Explainable AI, where users struggle to choose the right explanation technique from siloed options. It proposes a structural solution using multi-agent LLM orchestration to automatically translate user queries into appropriate XAI methods, bridging the gap between natural language uncertainty and technical explanations. This approach directly addresses a critical usability bottleneck in deploying effective AI interpretability tools.
Addressing the Selection Problem in Explainable AI
arXiv:2608.22356v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Explainable AI (XAI) research has produced a plethora of explanation techniques, yet user studies repeatedly show that available explanations are not effective in practice. We argue that, given the siloed nature of conventional XAI, users are struggling to select the appropriate XAI technique. Viewing XAI through a philosophical lens, we offer a formalization of what we call the selection problem: the systematic failure of XAI interfaces to bridge the gap between a user's natural-language uncertainty and the explanation technique that resolves it. Following a logical premise-conclusion format, we show that conventional interfaces require users to translate their uncertainty into a technique selection, a challenging prerequisite to meet. We also propose a structural solution: a multi-agent LLM orchestration tool that translates the user's query to the proper XAI explanation technique. We provide an example of how this structural solution could be instantiated to address the selection problem.
Abstract:Explainable AI (XAI) research has produced a plethora of explanation techniques, yet user studies repeatedly show that available explanations are not effective in practice. We argue that, given the siloed nature of conventional XAI, users are struggling to select the appropriate XAI technique. Viewing XAI through a philosophical lens, we offer a formalization of what we call the selection problem: the systematic failure of XAI interfaces to bridge the gap between a user's natural-language uncertainty and the explanation technique that resolves it. Following a logical premise-conclusion format, we show that conventional interfaces require users to translate their uncertainty into a technique selection, a challenging prerequisite to meet. We also propose a structural solution: a multi-agent LLM orchestration tool that translates the user's query to the proper XAI explanation technique. We provide an example of how this structural solution could be instantiated to address the selection problem.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
arXiv:2608.22356 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2608.22356v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.22356 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 243 words
Related coverage

RFPs: Neutral - Atom Platform Technologies Grant Programme
fundsforngos.org · Aug 17, 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
AI Alignment Forum · Sep 23, 2026

“Alignment Engineering” vs. “Misalignment Science”
LessWrong · Oct 5, 2026