aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces CERT-Replan, a novel framework for dynamic robot navigation that uses conformal prediction to detect when current planning modes become unsafe due to evolving prediction uncertainty. By triggering replanning based on calibrated risk thresholds rather than fixed intervals, the method significantly reduces collisions and unnecessary control interventions in non-stationary environments. The approach demonstrates practical feasibility through hardware experiments, offering a robust solution for safety-critical autonomous systems facing uncertain obstacle predictions.
Adaptive Risk-Certified Event-Triggered Replanning for Dynamic Navigation
arXiv:2610.09302v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Safe navigation in dynamic environments requires robots to plan under obstacle predictions whose errors are uncertain, non-stationary, and can induce rare but safety-critical failures. Existing control-barrier-function safety filters can reject immediately unsafe controls, but they provide little guidance on when the current finite-horizon planning mode itself is becoming unsafe as prediction uncertainty evolves. We propose Conformal Event-Triggered Risk-Certified Replanning (\emph{CERT-Replan}), a framework that uses calibrated barrier risk as an early-warning signal for replanning. CERT-Replan calibrates horizon-indexed obstacle-prediction residuals online and uses the resulting uncertainty radii to evaluate dynamic-obstacle safety margins. A one-step safety filter protects the next applied control, while a horizon-level risk monitor evaluates the upper-tail CVaR of predicted barrier-violation losses along the current MPC rollout. When this risk exceeds an allocated budget, CERT-Replan rejects the current planning mode and selects a lower-risk alternative, such as a different speed profile, corridor, or homotopy class, rather than repeatedly correcting the same nominal plan. In a non-stationary benchmark, CERT-Replan achieves an \(83.3\%\) collision reduction relative to the safety-filter-only baseline \textcolor{black}{and a \(77.8\%\) reduction relative to simple replanning triggers}, while reducing average safety-filter intervention by \(32.4\%\). \textcolor{black}{With Trajectron++, CERT-Replan achieves \(96\%\) collision-free operation. Hardware experiments and onboard runtime profiling demonstrate computational feasibility.}
Abstract:Safe navigation in dynamic environments requires robots to plan under obstacle predictions whose errors are uncertain, non-stationary, and can induce rare but safety-critical failures. Existing control-barrier-function safety filters can reject immediately unsafe controls, but they provide little guidance on when the current finite-horizon planning mode itself is becoming unsafe as prediction uncertainty evolves. We propose Conformal Event-Triggered Risk-Certified Replanning (\emph{CERT-Replan}), a framework that uses calibrated barrier risk as an early-warning signal for replanning. CERT-Replan calibrates horizon-indexed obstacle-prediction residuals online and uses the resulting uncertainty radii to evaluate dynamic-obstacle safety margins. A one-step safety filter protects the next applied control, while a horizon-level risk monitor evaluates the upper-tail CVaR of predicted barrier-violation losses along the current MPC rollout. When this risk exceeds an allocated budget, CERT-Replan rejects the current planning mode and selects a lower-risk alternative, such as a different speed profile, corridor, or homotopy class, rather than repeatedly correcting the same nominal plan. In a non-stationary benchmark, CERT-Replan achieves an \(83.3\%\) collision reduction relative to the safety-filter-only baseline \textcolor{black}{and a \(77.8\%\) reduction relative to simple replanning triggers}, while reducing average safety-filter intervention by \(32.4\%\). \textcolor{black}{With Trajectron++, CERT-Replan achieves \(96\%\) collision-free operation. Hardware experiments and onboard runtime profiling demonstrate computational feasibility.}
Robotics (cs.RO); Systems and Control (eess.SY)
arXiv:2610.09302 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2610.09302v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.09302 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 297 words
Related coverage
Problems of Proliferation
LessWrong · Sep 29, 2026
How bad would it be if GPS satellites were shot down?
LessWrong · Jun 12, 2026
A Generative Partially Specified Finite State Machine Approach to Complex Behaviour Planning
arXiv · Jul 20, 2026

AI and Quantum Computing Briefing
livetradingnews.com · Aug 4, 2026