aiqbench analysis
This research addresses the sparse reward problem in training GUI agents by introducing an adaptive-group process reward framework that dynamically partitions trajectories into semantically coherent subgoals. The method combines action-level and group-level evaluations to provide finer-grained guidance for reinforcement learning, demonstrating improved efficiency over standard outcome-based approaches.
Adaptive-Group Process Rewards for GUI Agents
arXiv:2610.17710v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Training graphical user interface (GUI) agents with reinforcement learning suffers from sparse outcome rewards, leading to inefficient learning. Process rewards offer a promising direction for credit assignment to intermediate actions; however, accurately evaluating an action requires identifying evidence across long-horizon GUI trajectories, as its value may depend on information beyond its immediate state and observation. In this paper, we propose an adaptive-group process reward framework that dynamically partitions a GUI trajectory into semantically coherent subgoal groups, enabling process reward estimation at both the action and group levels. At the action level, a critic evaluates each action based on the visual changes and subsequent actions within the group for action correctness and contribution to the subgoal. At the group level, the framework aggregates action-level evaluations to assess subgoal completion and contribution to the overall task, and further refines these assessments by leveraging the context of all groups in the trajectory. The process reward of each action is obtained by combining its action-level evaluation with the refined group-level evaluation. We further augment GRPO's outcome advantage with the proposed process rewards to provide finer-grained guidance for GUI agent training. Experiments on process reward benchmarks and downstream RL training demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework.
Abstract:Training graphical user interface (GUI) agents with reinforcement learning suffers from sparse outcome rewards, leading to inefficient learning. Process rewards offer a promising direction for credit assignment to intermediate actions; however, accurately evaluating an action requires identifying evidence across long-horizon GUI trajectories, as its value may depend on information beyond its immediate state and observation. In this paper, we propose an adaptive-group process reward framework that dynamically partitions a GUI trajectory into semantically coherent subgoal groups, enabling process reward estimation at both the action and group levels. At the action level, a critic evaluates each action based on the visual changes and subsequent actions within the group for action correctness and contribution to the subgoal. At the group level, the framework aggregates action-level evaluations to assess subgoal completion and contribution to the overall task, and further refines these assessments by leveraging the context of all groups in the trajectory. The process reward of each action is obtained by combining its action-level evaluation with the refined group-level evaluation. We further augment GRPO's outcome advantage with the proposed process rewards to provide finer-grained guidance for GUI agent training. Experiments on process reward benchmarks and downstream RL training demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.17710 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.17710v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.17710 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 296 words
Related coverage

Senior SWE-Bench: Evaluating Coding Agents Like Senior Engineers
Snorkel AI Blog · Jul 16, 2026

Mastering Agentic Techniques: AI Agent Customization
NVIDIA · May 20, 2026

Koopman Theory and Metaethics
LessWrong · Sep 19, 2026
Continual Learning Bench: measuring whether AI systems actually improve with experience
Snorkel AI Blog · Aug 21, 2026