aiqbench analysis
This paper advances statistical learning theory by adapting conformal prediction methods to regression problems defined on the Grassmann manifold, leveraging geometric distances for basis-invariant uncertainty quantification. The approach demonstrates improved coverage uniformity and region efficiency in heteroscedastic settings through a learned difficulty estimator, offering a rigorous framework for shape-design tasks involving subspace-valued outputs.
Adaptive conformal prediction on the Grassmannian
arXiv:2610.23508v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce a conformal prediction framework for regression with Grassmann-valued responses. The proposed method constructs prediction regions in the form of metric balls directly on the Grassmann manifold, using basis-invariant geometric distances as non-conformity measures and scaling the corresponding non-conformity scores through a learned prediction difficulty estimator. This yields locally adaptive, input-dependent prediction regions that respect the underlying manifold geometry, while retaining the finite-sample marginal coverage guarantee of split conformal prediction under exchangeability. We evaluate several Grassmannian distance metrics and compare their prediction-region efficiency on synthetic benchmarks and an airfoil inverse shape-design problem. The results highlight the advantages of geometry-aware non-conformity scores, while local adaptation improves empirical coverage uniformity across prediction difficulty levels and, in strongly heteroscedastic settings, can substantially reduce prediction-region size while maintaining the target coverage.
Abstract:We introduce a conformal prediction framework for regression with Grassmann-valued responses. The proposed method constructs prediction regions in the form of metric balls directly on the Grassmann manifold, using basis-invariant geometric distances as non-conformity measures and scaling the corresponding non-conformity scores through a learned prediction difficulty estimator. This yields locally adaptive, input-dependent prediction regions that respect the underlying manifold geometry, while retaining the finite-sample marginal coverage guarantee of split conformal prediction under exchangeability. We evaluate several Grassmannian distance metrics and compare their prediction-region efficiency on synthetic benchmarks and an airfoil inverse shape-design problem. The results highlight the advantages of geometry-aware non-conformity scores, while local adaptation improves empirical coverage uniformity across prediction difficulty levels and, in strongly heteroscedastic settings, can substantially reduce prediction-region size while maintaining the target coverage.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.23508 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2610.23508v1 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.23508 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 225 words
Related coverage
CASCADE Conformal Prediction: Uncertainty-Adaptive Prediction Intervals for Two-Stage Clinical Decision Support
arXiv · Jun 5, 2026
Conformal Bayes under Label Shift: Post-Hoc Calibration vs. In-Training Adaptation
arXiv · Jun 12, 2026
CASCADE Conformal Prediction: Uncertainty-Adaptive Prediction Intervals for Two-Stage Clinical Decision Support
arXiv · Oct 2, 2026
Dynamic Regime-Aware Conformal Calibration for Reliable Economic Forecast Intervals under Multiple Distribution Shifts
arXiv · Aug 20, 2026