Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses the challenge of non-stationarity in decentralized multi-agent systems by introducing DRFC, a method that filters out local reward fluctuations to detect only genuine shifts in the global optimal strategy. By proving dynamic regret bounds independent of irrelevant local changes, the study provides a robust framework for heterogeneous networks facing complex drift scenarios. Experiments across synthetic and real-world datasets confirm its ability to ignore noise while accurately propagating necessary policy updates through communication graphs.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Adapting to Decision-Relevant Non-Stationarity in Decentralized Heterogeneous Bandits

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.16824v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Decentralized bandit systems often contain heterogeneous agents: rewards can change at individual agents even when the best action for the network stays the same. These local changes may cancel when rewards are averaged across agents, so the number of local changes $\Stloc$ can be much larger than the number of changes in the best common arm $\Stdec$. We introduce Decision-Relevant Fresh Comparison (DRFC), which uses new, balanced samples from all agents to compare arms at the network level and switches only when fresh global evidence indicates that the common best arm has changed. We prove a high-probability dynamic regret bound with no adaptation term depending on $\Stloc$, and show that every algorithm must still pay for identifying genuine decision switches and propagating them through the communication graph. Under a distinct time-average benchmark, an anytime-valid sliding-window extension handles gradual drift; experiments on synthetic, semi-real, and MovieLens-1M replays show that DRFC ignores decision-irrelevant local changes while the extension avoids false switches.

Abstract:Decentralized bandit systems often contain heterogeneous agents: rewards can change at individual agents even when the best action for the network stays the same. These local changes may cancel when rewards are averaged across agents, so the number of local changes $\Stloc$ can be much larger than the number of changes in the best common arm $\Stdec$. We introduce Decision-Relevant Fresh Comparison (DRFC), which uses new, balanced samples from all agents to compare arms at the network level and switches only when fresh global evidence indicates that the common best arm has changed. We prove a high-probability dynamic regret bound with no adaptation term depending on $\Stloc$, and show that every algorithm must still pay for identifying genuine decision switches and propagating them through the communication graph. Under a distinct time-average benchmark, an anytime-valid sliding-window extension handles gradual drift; experiments on synthetic, semi-real, and MovieLens-1M replays show that DRFC ignores decision-irrelevant local changes while the extension avoids false switches.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2609.16824 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.16824v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.16824 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 253 words

Related coverage