aiqbench analysis
AdaHAT addresses catastrophic forgetting in task-incremental learning by introducing an adaptive attention mechanism that dynamically manages static parameters to preserve long-term knowledge. This approach effectively balances network stability with plasticity, enabling models to maintain performance across extended sequences of new tasks without sacrificing capacity for future learning. The method represents a significant architectural improvement over existing hard-attention baselines for continuous machine learning scenarios.
AdaHAT: Adaptive Hard Attention to the Task in Task-Incremental Learning
arXiv:2608.01252v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Catastrophic forgetting is a major problem in task-incremental learning, where neural networks tend to overwrite previously learned knowledge when trained on new tasks. A number of architecture-based approaches have been proposed to address this problem. However, the architecture-based approaches suffer from another problem related to network capacity when the networks learn long task sequences: As a network is trained on an increasing number of new tasks in a long task sequence, a growing proportion of active parameters becomes static to prevent forgetting of previously learned knowledge. In this paper, we propose Adaptive Hard Attention to the Task (AdaHAT) with an adaptive attention mechanism which allows adaptive updates to static parameters by taking into account the information about previous tasks on both the importance of these parameters to previous tasks and the current network capacity. Based on this idea, we develop a new neural network architecture incorporating our proposed AdaHAT mechanism. AdaHAT extends an existing architecture-based approach, Hard Attention to the Task (HAT), to better support task-incremental learning over long task sequences. We conduct experiments on a number of datasets and compare AdaHAT with task-incremental learning baselines including HAT. Our experimental results show that AdaHAT achieves better average performance across tasks than these baselines, especially on long task sequences, demonstrating the benefits from balancing the trade-off between stability and plasticity of a network when learning such sequences of tasks, alleviating the network capacity problem. Our code is available at pengxiang-wang.com/projects/continual-learning-arena.
Abstract:Catastrophic forgetting is a major problem in task-incremental learning, where neural networks tend to overwrite previously learned knowledge when trained on new tasks. A number of architecture-based approaches have been proposed to address this problem. However, the architecture-based approaches suffer from another problem related to network capacity when the networks learn long task sequences: As a network is trained on an increasing number of new tasks in a long task sequence, a growing proportion of active parameters becomes static to prevent forgetting of previously learned knowledge. In this paper, we propose Adaptive Hard Attention to the Task (AdaHAT) with an adaptive attention mechanism which allows adaptive updates to static parameters by taking into account the information about previous tasks on both the importance of these parameters to previous tasks and the current network capacity. Based on this idea, we develop a new neural network architecture incorporating our proposed AdaHAT mechanism. AdaHAT extends an existing architecture-based approach, Hard Attention to the Task (HAT), to better support task-incremental learning over long task sequences. We conduct experiments on a number of datasets and compare AdaHAT with task-incremental learning baselines including HAT. Our experimental results show that AdaHAT achieves better average performance across tasks than these baselines, especially on long task sequences, demonstrating the benefits from balancing the trade-off between stability and plasticity of a network when learning such sequences of tasks, alleviating the network capacity problem. Our code is available at this http URL.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.01252 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.01252v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.01252 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Proceedings of the European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. pp. 143-160 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70352-2_9 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 364 words
Related coverage

Expenditure Horizon: Measuring Optimization Ability, with an Application to NanoGPT
METR · Jul 21, 2026

An unexamined cause of the OpenAI Hugging Face hacking incident: its binary performance metric
LessWrong · Sep 23, 2026
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026

The art and science of hyperparameter optimization on Amazon Nova Forge
AWS · Jun 2, 2026