aiqbench analysis
This study investigates whether transformer activations can effectively guide sample selection for in-context learning, concluding that standard MLP and embedding layer outputs fail to correlate with example quality across diverse models and tasks. The authors attribute this negative result to the phenomenon of superposition, suggesting that future efforts should explore more interpretable methods like Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) to unlock fine-grained signals for active learning.
Activation-Based Active Learning for In-Context Learning: Challenges and Insights
arXiv:2606.05134v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deep active learning has previously been explored for LLM in-context sample selection, but not with methods that utilise recent advances in understanding of transformer activations. In this paper, we test the hypothesis that model activations could provide a fine-grained signal to optimise the selection of in-context examples. We present a comprehensive analysis of MLP activation-based deep active learning methods applied to in-context learning, including how different attention masking strategies impact active learning across diverse classification and generative datasets, using both Llama-3.2-3B and Qwen2.5-3B base models. However, we find a negative result: MLP and embedding layer outputs, viewed through the lenses of massive activations or the first four moments, do not correlate with example quality or task performance. Specifically, the absolute Spearman correlation coefficient is at most 0.33 for all tasks and models we tested, showing that such activation-based sampling should not be used for in-context learning. We hypothesise that this may be due to superposition, whereby models represent more features than they have dimensionality, suggesting that methods like Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) may be a promising future direction.
Abstract:Deep active learning has previously been explored for LLM in-context sample selection, but not with methods that utilise recent advances in understanding of transformer activations. In this paper, we test the hypothesis that model activations could provide a fine-grained signal to optimise the selection of in-context examples. We present a comprehensive analysis of MLP activation-based deep active learning methods applied to in-context learning, including how different attention masking strategies impact active learning across diverse classification and generative datasets, using both Llama-3.2-3B and Qwen2.5-3B base models. However, we find a negative result: MLP and embedding layer outputs, viewed through the lenses of massive activations or the first four moments, do not correlate with example quality or task performance. Specifically, the absolute Spearman correlation coefficient is at most 0.33 for all tasks and models we tested, showing that such activation-based sampling should not be used for in-context learning. We hypothesise that this may be due to superposition, whereby models represent more features than they have dimensionality, suggesting that methods like Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) may be a promising future direction.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2606.05134 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2606.05134v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.05134 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 273 words
Related coverage
What's Continual Learning, and Why Might We Expect To See It In Advanced LLM Agents?
LessWrong · Jun 12, 2026

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · Aug 27, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Oct 3, 2026

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · Sep 17, 2026