aiqbench analysis
This research advances distributed intelligence by quantifying how peer-sensor information improves robustness in embodied agents under partial failure conditions. The study distinguishes operational predictive gains from theoretical channel capacity, offering a rigorous framework for designing resilient multi-agent systems where local dynamics obscure future utility.
Action-Directed Information for Distributed Control and Agentic Interaction
arXiv:2609.27580v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Distributed intelligence concerns systems in which semi-autonomous components with local dynamics and partial observations coordinate through information exchange to maintain a shared function. This paper proposes an operational way to study such systems: measure information at the interface where a message changes a receiving action, then connect that measure to function by intervention and disturbance evaluation. We instantiate this proposal in DI-Walker, a two-dimensional four-limb embodied plant controlled by frozen Cross-Entropy-Method policies. We compare a controller using each limb's own realized-force sensor with one using the realized-force sensors of peer limbs. Under limb loss, limb slip, and weak central-control dropout, Peer-Sensor has lower late tracking error in several conditions. A corrected finite-history action-predictive estimator shows a substantially larger peer-message gain under compound failure. A future scalar functional-prediction estimator does not show the same stable advantage. We interpret this discrepancy as a methodological result: information useful for an intermediate control action can be hidden by later plant dynamics, redundancy, and context. The paper relates this result to Predictive Information, Transfer Entropy, Directed Information, information-to-go/IT-PAC ideas, empowerment, and the robust control data-rate perspective, while explicitly distinguishing operational predictive gains from exact Directed Information, channel capacity, and a formal data-rate theorem.
Abstract:Distributed intelligence concerns systems in which semi-autonomous components with local dynamics and partial observations coordinate through information exchange to maintain a shared function. This paper proposes an operational way to study such systems: measure information at the interface where a message changes a receiving action, then connect that measure to function by intervention and disturbance evaluation. We instantiate this proposal in DI-Walker, a two-dimensional four-limb embodied plant controlled by frozen Cross-Entropy-Method policies. We compare a controller using each limb's own realized-force sensor with one using the realized-force sensors of peer limbs. Under limb loss, limb slip, and weak central-control dropout, Peer-Sensor has lower late tracking error in several conditions. A corrected finite-history action-predictive estimator shows a substantially larger peer-message gain under compound failure. A future scalar functional-prediction estimator does not show the same stable advantage. We interpret this discrepancy as a methodological result: information useful for an intermediate control action can be hidden by later plant dynamics, redundancy, and context. The paper relates this result to Predictive Information, Transfer Entropy, Directed Information, information-to-go/IT-PAC ideas, empowerment, and the robust control data-rate perspective, while explicitly distinguishing operational predictive gains from exact Directed Information, channel capacity, and a formal data-rate theorem.
Systems and Control (eess.SY); Information Theory (cs.IT); Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2609.27580 [eess.SY]
(or arXiv:2609.27580v1 [eess.SY] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.27580 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 298 words
Related coverage

Game-Theoretic Disempowerment: Loss of Control to Agencyless AI
LessWrong · Sep 27, 2026

Implementing and Evaluating a Basic Per-Action Monitor for Safer Evals
METR · Sep 27, 2026

Presentation: Automating the Web With MCP: Infra That Doesn’t Break
InfoQ · Jun 16, 2026

Modernizing and scaling support operations with generative AI on AWS
AWS · Sep 2, 2026