aiqbench analysis
This research introduces ALONE, a Bayesian spatial world model enabling drones to navigate effectively with intermittent sensor input by maintaining internal spatial beliefs. By selectively acquiring observations only when confidence drops below critical thresholds, the system frees shared sensors for other tasks while achieving near-perfect success rates in simulation and real-world trials. This approach represents a significant step toward efficient, multi-task robotic autonomy where sensing resources are constrained or shared.
Acting from Belief, Looking When Needed: A Bayesian Spatial World Model for Navigation under Intermittent Perception
arXiv:2610.11591v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Robot navigation commonly uses wide-coverage, high-frequency sensing to reduce partial observability; this reliance becomes restrictive when another task temporarily redirects a shared sensor from navigation, interrupting navigation-relevant observations. We study navigation under intermittent perception: acting from an internal spatial belief and looking again only when execution needs a new observation, potentially freeing the shared sensor for other tasks between navigation observations. ALONE, a Bayesian spatial world model, propagates a structured spatial belief using executed actions and corrects it with selectively acquired observations; learned priors over common geometric structures infer unobserved structure from available observation history. It decodes the belief into a spatial estimate for the motion-planning module and predicts a reliability map expressing confidence in the estimate's accuracy. ALONE requests an observation only if insufficient reliability hinders navigation and new evidence should make relevant-region spatial information more reliable; otherwise, it continues acting from the propagated belief. We instantiate ALONE for drone navigation with intermittent single-camera depth images. Across two simulated scene families, it achieves 98% and 97% closed-loop success at a 10 Hz decision rate. Among successful trials, median fractions of decision steps requiring a new depth observation are only 0.9% and 1.3%, respectively, demonstrating high navigation success with substantially reduced observation demand. Real-world indoor flight experiments further validate navigation under intermittent depth observations, with all 10 trials successful.
Abstract:Robot navigation commonly uses wide-coverage, high-frequency sensing to reduce partial observability; this reliance becomes restrictive when another task temporarily redirects a shared sensor from navigation, interrupting navigation-relevant observations. We study navigation under intermittent perception: acting from an internal spatial belief and looking again only when execution needs a new observation, potentially freeing the shared sensor for other tasks between navigation observations. ALONE, a Bayesian spatial world model, propagates a structured spatial belief using executed actions and corrects it with selectively acquired observations; learned priors over common geometric structures infer unobserved structure from available observation history. It decodes the belief into a spatial estimate for the motion-planning module and predicts a reliability map expressing confidence in the estimate's accuracy. ALONE requests an observation only if insufficient reliability hinders navigation and new evidence should make relevant-region spatial information more reliable; otherwise, it continues acting from the propagated belief. We instantiate ALONE for drone navigation with intermittent single-camera depth images. Across two simulated scene families, it achieves 98% and 97% closed-loop success at a 10 Hz decision rate. Among successful trials, median fractions of decision steps requiring a new depth observation are only 0.9% and 1.3%, respectively, demonstrating high navigation success with substantially reduced observation demand. Real-world indoor flight experiments further validate navigation under intermittent depth observations, with all 10 trials successful.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2610.11591 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2610.11591v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.11591 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 312 words
Related coverage

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026

Taboo “equilibrium”: Less confused frames for research on AI bargaining
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026
Book Review: On What Matters, volume 3
LessWrong · Aug 3, 2026
Toward a Kantian refutation of Agent Foundations
LessWrong · Jun 17, 2026