Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This paper introduces the ABSTRACTS benchmark suite to standardize efficiency comparisons for classical simulators of non-Clifford quantum circuits, addressing the current fragmentation in simulation literature. By providing a consistent dataset and virtual hardware environment, it enables fair evaluation of techniques like stabilizer decomposition and tensor contraction across varying circuit depths and gate counts.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

ABSTRACTS: Amsterdam Benchmark Suite for the Time and Resource Analysis of Clifford+T Simulators

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.24370v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent years have seen a rapid growth in literature presenting new methods for simulating non-Clifford quantum circuits with classical hardware. These methods span a range of approaches, including stabiliser decomposition and tensor contraction techniques, varying in efficiency depending on circuit class, depth, non-Clifford gate count, and other metrics. A notable limitation of this literature is the lack of a standardised approach to benchmarking, with each new paper outlining its own specification, simulating its own set of circuits on the authors' own hardware. This paper seeks to address this issue by presenting a standardised and canonical benchmark suite and infrastructure for quantifying the efficiency of non-Clifford classical simulators, with a consistent dataset of circuits and providing consistent (virtual) hardware, thereby enabling a fair comparison of results.

Abstract:Recent years have seen a rapid growth in literature presenting new methods for simulating non-Clifford quantum circuits with classical hardware. These methods span a range of approaches, including stabiliser decomposition and tensor contraction techniques, varying in efficiency depending on circuit class, depth, non-Clifford gate count, and other metrics. A notable limitation of this literature is the lack of a standardised approach to benchmarking, with each new paper outlining its own specification, simulating its own set of circuits on the authors' own hardware. This paper seeks to address this issue by presenting a standardised and canonical benchmark suite and infrastructure for quantifying the efficiency of non-Clifford classical simulators, with a consistent dataset of circuits and providing consistent (virtual) hardware, thereby enabling a fair comparison of results.

This manuscript corresponds to version 0.1 of the ABSTRACTS repository: this https URL

Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Performance (cs.PF)

arXiv:2608.24370 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2608.24370v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.24370 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 234 words

Related coverage