aiqbench analysis
This research demonstrates that incorporating workflow graph topology significantly improves the accuracy of task-level resource intensity predictions for cloud infrastructure. By benchmarking various modeling approaches, the study confirms that graph-native models outperform baselines and can be effectively combined with simple topological features to minimize CPU and memory provisioning errors. This work advances the field of machine learning applied to distributed computing by quantifying how structural dependencies in Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) influence resource demands.
About the Influence of Workflow Topology on Task Intensity Prediction through Graph Learning
arXiv:2609.39481v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Efficient resource provisioning for large-scale workflows on cloud infrastructures is a critical performance engineering challenge. These workflows are often structured as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), where under-provisioning can cause critical bottlenecks and over-provisioning leads to unnecessary costs. Accurate, task-level prediction of resource intensity (e.g., CPU load and memory usage) is essential for mitigating these issues. While task-level features are commonly used for prediction, the performance impact of the workflow's overall topological structure is often overlooked or assumed. The central question of our work is: To what extent does what part of the DAG topology influence task-level resource intensity, and what is the most effective way to model this influence? This paper presents a comprehensive benchmark to systematically quantify the impact of graph topology on task intensity prediction. We evaluate and compare a spectrum of modeling approaches. Our findings demonstrate that topology is a critical feature for accurate prediction. Models incorporating important topological information, even through simple handcrafted features, significantly outperform baseline models. We show that graph-native models provide the highest accuracy, achieving low mean absolute errors for both CPU and memory predictions, and can still be combined with simple topological features that they do not learn for better performance.
Abstract:Efficient resource provisioning for large-scale workflows on cloud infrastructures is a critical performance engineering challenge. These workflows are often structured as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), where under-provisioning can cause critical bottlenecks and over-provisioning leads to unnecessary costs. Accurate, task-level prediction of resource intensity (e.g., CPU load and memory usage) is essential for mitigating these issues. While task-level features are commonly used for prediction, the performance impact of the workflow's overall topological structure is often overlooked or assumed. The central question of our work is: To what extent does what part of the DAG topology influence task-level resource intensity, and what is the most effective way to model this influence? This paper presents a comprehensive benchmark to systematically quantify the impact of graph topology on task intensity prediction. We evaluate and compare a spectrum of modeling approaches. Our findings demonstrate that topology is a critical feature for accurate prediction. Models incorporating important topological information, even through simple handcrafted features, significantly outperform baseline models. We show that graph-native models provide the highest accuracy, achieving low mean absolute errors for both CPU and memory predictions, and can still be combined with simple topological features that they do not learn for better performance.
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.39481 [cs.DC]
(or arXiv:2609.39481v1 [cs.DC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.39481 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Otto, Max, et al. "About the Influence of Workflow Topology on Task Intensity Prediction Through Graph Learning." 2026 IEEE 26th International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Internet Computing Workshops (CCGridW). IEEE, 2026
https://doi.org/10.1109/CCGridW69005.2026.00044 DOI(s) linking to related resources
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 261 words
Related coverage

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

Reviewing failure modes in science as we prepare for AI researchers
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026

Building Blocks for Foundation Model Training and Inference on AWS
Hugging Face · May 11, 2026