Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This study presents an end-to-end implementation of a variational quantum eigensolver within a cutting-plane framework to address memory bottlenecks in semidefinite programming, a critical subfield for machine learning and control theory. Experimental results on SDPLIB benchmarks demonstrate that the hybrid approach effectively closes optimality gaps while revealing practical constraints like matrix padding effects and Pauli basis density that pure theoretical models often miss. These findings offer valuable insights into the performance limits of near-term quantum-classical hybrids for solving large-scale optimization problems.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

A variational quantum eigensolver-based cutting plane framework for semidefinite programming problems

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.02139v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Semidefinite programming plays a key role in optimization, with broad impact across control theory, machine learning, and combinatorial optimization. Although semidefinite programs are polynomially solvable, several commonly used algorithms rest on a linear-algebraic step whose running time grows cubically with the matrix dimension and which requires the matrix itself to be held in memory, at quadratic cost. In this study, we propose replacing it with a variational quantum eigensolver, whose qubit requirement is logarithmic in the matrix dimension, and present the first end-to-end implementation of such an approach within a cutting-plane framework, together with an operator-derived ansatz whose entanglement structure is read directly from the Pauli support of the candidate matrix. Evaluated on the control family of SDPLIB against an identical scheme driven by an exact eigendecomposition, the variational oracle produces valid cuts throughout, closing 32 to 82% of the initial optimality gap against a near-constant 75 to 82% for the exact oracle. Implementing and measuring the method end to end surfaces several effects not visible from theoretical analyses alone: where memory is actually consumed, how the padding required to fit a matrix onto a quantum register can mislead the variational optimizer, and why the candidate matrices prove dense in the Pauli basis, reducing the operator-derived ansatz to full entanglement. We report these findings and discuss their implications for near-term hybrid quantum-classical approaches.

Abstract:Semidefinite programming plays a key role in optimization, with broad impact across control theory, machine learning, and combinatorial optimization. Although semidefinite programs are polynomially solvable, several commonly used algorithms rest on a linear-algebraic step whose running time grows cubically with the matrix dimension and which requires the matrix itself to be held in memory, at quadratic cost. In this study, we propose replacing it with a variational quantum eigensolver, whose qubit requirement is logarithmic in the matrix dimension, and present the first end-to-end implementation of such an approach within a cutting-plane framework, together with an operator-derived ansatz whose entanglement structure is read directly from the Pauli support of the candidate matrix. Evaluated on the control family of SDPLIB against an identical scheme driven by an exact eigendecomposition, the variational oracle produces valid cuts throughout, closing 32 to 82% of the initial optimality gap against a near-constant 75 to 82% for the exact oracle. Implementing and measuring the method end to end surfaces several effects not visible from theoretical analyses alone: where memory is actually consumed, how the padding required to fit a matrix onto a quantum register can mislead the variational optimizer, and why the candidate matrices prove dense in the Pauli basis, reducing the operator-derived ansatz to full entanglement. We report these findings and discuss their implications for near-term hybrid quantum-classical approaches.

Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Optimization and Control (math.OC)

arXiv:2609.02139 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2609.02139v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.02139 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 321 words

Related coverage