aiqbench analysis
This research establishes a universal mathematical constant that defines the optimal efficiency for multi-pass quantum sensing schemes where samples are scarce rather than light. By deriving a single trade-off function, the study proves that recycling a single photon is superior to using N00N states or other complex entangled resources for measuring weakly absorbing objects. The findings provide a fundamental benchmark for designing loss-limited quantum sensors in fields like biological imaging and nanoscale metrology.
A universal loss-limited optimum for fixed multi-pass quantum sensing per absorbed photon
arXiv:2608.25534v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-pass schemes send a photon through a sample several times to learn more about it. When the sample rather than the light is scarce, the natural figure of merit is the information gained per photon the object absorbs. We show that one constant fixes the loss-limited optimum of every fixed scheme in which a single photon passes repeatedly through the sample and is detected once at the end. Three properties suffice: information that grows as the square of the pass number, a fixed survival probability per pass, and no dose from a photon already lost. They force a single trade-off function $h(x)=x^2/(e^x-1)$, where $x$ is the number of passes times the loss per pass. Its maximum, 0.648, sits at $x_{\mathrm{opt}}=1.594$. The loss-limited ceiling of interaction-free interrogation and the multi-pass phase optimum of Yu et al. are two instances. Phase sensing of a weakly absorbing object is a third, optimal at $m_{\mathrm{opt}}=x_{\mathrm{opt}}/(\epsilon+\alpha)$ passes; the absorption $\alpha$ and the parasitic loss $\epsilon$ enter the optimum only through their sum, but the damage counts only $\alpha$. N00N states and their loss-robust generalisations do worse per absorbed photon, and optimising over photon number and pass number together returns a single recycled photon. Two further problems are priced in the same measure. Absorption estimation gains nothing, for any scheme. Detecting a faint companion below the Rayleigh limit costs the companion a dose that does not depend on its faintness, while under direct imaging the dose grows without bound. For a fragile sample the gentlest measurement is also the simplest one: a single photon, recycled.
Abstract:Multi-pass schemes send a photon through a sample several times to learn more about it. When the sample rather than the light is scarce, the natural figure of merit is the information gained per photon the object absorbs. We show that one constant fixes the loss-limited optimum of every fixed scheme in which a single photon passes repeatedly through the sample and is detected once at the end. Three properties suffice: information that grows as the square of the pass number, a fixed survival probability per pass, and no dose from a photon already lost. They force a single trade-off function $h(x)=x^2/(e^x-1)$, where $x$ is the number of passes times the loss per pass. Its maximum, 0.648, sits at $x_{\mathrm{opt}}=1.594$. The loss-limited ceiling of interaction-free interrogation and the multi-pass phase optimum of Yu et al. are two instances. Phase sensing of a weakly absorbing object is a third, optimal at $m_{\mathrm{opt}}=x_{\mathrm{opt}}/(\epsilon+\alpha)$ passes; the absorption $\alpha$ and the parasitic loss $\epsilon$ enter the optimum only through their sum, but the damage counts only $\alpha$. N00N states and their loss-robust generalisations do worse per absorbed photon, and optimising over photon number and pass number together returns a single recycled photon. Two further problems are priced in the same measure. Absorption estimation gains nothing, for any scheme. Detecting a faint companion below the Rayleigh limit costs the companion a dose that does not depend on its faintness, while under direct imaging the dose grows without bound. For a fragile sample the gentlest measurement is also the simplest one: a single photon, recycled.
arXiv:2608.25534 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2608.25534v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.25534 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 350 words
Related coverage

How Photonic Chips Differ From Electronic Chips
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 19, 2026

LiveLaw Supreme Court Half-Yearly Digest: January - June 2026 [Part 2]
livelaw.in · Sep 13, 2026

Inside D-Wave’s Dual-Rail Qubit Roadmap and the New Haven Bet on Logical Qubits
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 11, 2026
News Archive 2026
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026