aiqbench analysis
This research addresses the critical challenge of aligning large language models with specific human values by introducing a unified dataset designed explicitly for moral scenarios. By merging existing resources into an instruction-response format, the study demonstrates that integrating this data preserves general capabilities while enhancing performance on value-oriented tasks. The work provides a foundational resource for advancing safety and alignment research in next-generation AI systems.
A Unified Moral-Value Dataset for Instruction Tuning
arXiv:2607.21279v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have developed rapidly and become valuable tools in everyday life. However, how to align LLMs to a particular set of human values is still an open problem. Recent studies show that instruction tuning has strong potential for zero-shot tasks and may serve as an effective approach to addressing value alignment. Nevertheless, although many datasets for instruction tuning already exist, they are not specifically designed around moral scenarios and behaviors. We construct a unified moral-value dataset that can be directly used for instruction tuning. This dataset is built upon existing moral-value datasets by merging them into a unified corpus and converting them into an instruction-response format. We show that training on a mixed dataset combining general task datasets with our dataset preserves general-task performance, and we report preliminary observations on how the mixing ratio affects value-oriented task performance. Our work provides a moral-value dataset for instruction tuning and offers a useful resource for further alignment research. The dataset is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/teohzzh/value-for-instruction-tuning.
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) have developed rapidly and become valuable tools in everyday life. However, how to align LLMs to a particular set of human values is still an open problem. Recent studies show that instruction tuning has strong potential for zero-shot tasks and may serve as an effective approach to addressing value alignment. Nevertheless, although many datasets for instruction tuning already exist, they are not specifically designed around moral scenarios and behaviors. We construct a unified moral-value dataset that can be directly used for instruction tuning. This dataset is built upon existing moral-value datasets by merging them into a unified corpus and converting them into an instruction-response format. We show that training on a mixed dataset combining general task datasets with our dataset preserves general-task performance, and we report preliminary observations on how the mixing ratio affects value-oriented task performance. Our work provides a moral-value dataset for instruction tuning and offers a useful resource for further alignment research. The dataset is available at this https URL.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2607.21279 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2607.21279v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.21279 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 262 words
Related coverage

Import AI 470: No rights for machines; automating environment generation with SPADE; and building better GPU kernels with Hawkeye
Import AI · Aug 24, 2026

The basic argument for making AI better at moral philosophy
LessWrong · Oct 14, 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026
Geometry of Values: Task Vector Composition for Ethical Preference Alignment in Language Models
arXiv · Sep 22, 2026