Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This paper proposes a unified framework for probability that bridges frequentist, Bayesian, and operationalist views by partitioning systems into object and environment subsystems. The author argues that this refined interpretation resolves classic paradoxes and offers new insights into quantum puzzles by grounding probabilistic definitions in repeatable events under specific conditions. While the work touches on quantum foundations, its primary contribution lies in redefining the mathematical and philosophical underpinnings of probability theory itself.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

A unified interpretation of probability

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.38293v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In this article I revisit the frequency interpretation of probability of von Mises, and argue that it contains the key elements of any coherent interpretation of scientific probability - notwithstanding the heavy criticisms von Mises collected from mathematicians and philosophers alike. I propose a modified definition that is not based on von Mises' "infinite collectives" but retains an essential ingredient of his interpretation, namely that probability can only quantitatively be defined for events that are, or can be, repeated in similar conditions and that exhibit frequency stabilisation. New is that the mentioned "conditions" should be "partitioned". Thus, I will partition probabilistic systems into object and environment, or in object, initiating, and probing subsystem, and show that such partitioning solves a series of classic problems. Other consistent interpretations can be unified with frequentism, e.g. Bayesianism \`a la Jaynes. I explore in detail the tantalising subjective or operationalist touch of probability, and argue that it can be put on objective grounds. One further upshot of the model is that several quantum puzzles can be seen as deriving from an imprecise interpretation of probability.

Abstract:In this article I revisit the frequency interpretation of probability of von Mises, and argue that it contains the key elements of any coherent interpretation of scientific probability - notwithstanding the heavy criticisms von Mises collected from mathematicians and philosophers alike. I propose a modified definition that is not based on von Mises' "infinite collectives" but retains an essential ingredient of his interpretation, namely that probability can only quantitatively be defined for events that are, or can be, repeated in similar conditions and that exhibit frequency stabilisation. New is that the mentioned "conditions" should be "partitioned". Thus, I will partition probabilistic systems into object and environment, or in object, initiating, and probing subsystem, and show that such partitioning solves a series of classic problems. Other consistent interpretations can be unified with frequentism, e.g. Bayesianism à la Jaynes. I explore in detail the tantalising subjective or operationalist touch of probability, and argue that it can be put on objective grounds. One further upshot of the model is that several quantum puzzles can be seen as deriving from an imprecise interpretation of probability.

This is the penultimate version of Chapter 4 of my book "Problem solving in philosophy. How to do philosophy in the age of ultra-intelligent AI" (cf. this https URL). The present article is for 99.99% identical to the book chapter (which is the last version)

History and Overview (math.HO); Probability (math.PR); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)

arXiv:2609.38293 [math.HO]

(or arXiv:2609.38293v1 [math.HO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.38293 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 326 words

Related coverage