aiqbench analysis
This research introduces a framework for uncertainty-aware explainable AI (XAI) by modeling explanations as distributions rather than single maps, offering more robust insights into model confidence during power quality disturbance classification. By separating posterior-approximation errors from finite-sample issues, the proposed method provides deeper theoretical clarity on how stochasticity affects attribution in deep ensembles.
A Unified Framework for Uncertainty-Aware Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Case Study in Power Quality Disturbance Classification
arXiv:2605.21114v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Post-hoc explainable AI (XAI) methods usually return one attribution map, even when the model represents uncertainty in its parameters. We define the \emph{explanation distribution} as the distribution of attribution maps obtained from sampled models. The uncertainty-aware relevance attribution operator (UA-RAO) summarises this distribution using the mean, dispersion, quantiles, and agreement sets. The theory separates posterior-approximation error from finite-sample error and accounts for changes across activation boundaries and for stochastic explainers. On a 15-class power-quality-disturbance benchmark, the mean occlusion explanation from a deep ensemble aligns better with known disturbance regions than the deterministic baseline, although the improvement depends on the disturbance type. Tests with controlled input distortions show that additive noise changes the explanations more than amplitude scaling or aligned temporal shifts.
Abstract:Post-hoc explainable AI (XAI) methods usually return one attribution map, even when the model represents uncertainty in its parameters. We define the \emph{explanation distribution} as the distribution of attribution maps obtained from sampled models. The uncertainty-aware relevance attribution operator (UA-RAO) summarises this distribution using the mean, dispersion, quantiles, and agreement sets. The theory separates posterior-approximation error from finite-sample error and accounts for changes across activation boundaries and for stochastic explainers. On a 15-class power-quality-disturbance benchmark, the mean occlusion explanation from a deep ensemble aligns better with known disturbance regions than the deterministic baseline, although the improvement depends on the disturbance type. Tests with controlled input distortions show that additive noise changes the explanations more than amplitude scaling or aligned temporal shifts.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2605.21114 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2605.21114v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.21114 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 213 words
Related coverage
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026
Salesforce after Dreamforce: How the CRM giant can grow beyond its own interface
SiliconANGLE · Sep 19, 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026
FST.ai 2.5: Explainable and Uncertainty-Aware AI for Olympic and Para-Taekwondo Decision Support, Athlete Digital Twins, and Federation-Scale Analytics
arXiv · Jul 21, 2026