aiqbench analysis
This research proposes using unsupervised machine learning on DOM tree structures to fingerprint phishing templates, addressing the limitation of current reactive defenses that miss coordinated campaigns based on structural reuse. By clustering HTML architectures rather than relying solely on surface content or supervised models, the study offers a novel method for detecting zero-day template variations and attributing attacks without needing prior labeled data. The findings suggest that analyzing web page topology provides a robust mechanism to identify industrialized phishing operations before they fully mature into widespread threats.
A Tree-Structured Approach for Phishing Template and Attacker Attribution Analysis
arXiv:2608.16158v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Phishing remains a persistent and evolving cybersecurity threat, with attack volumes reaching record levels. This growth is driven by the industrialization of phishing through widely available phishing kits and reusable templates, which enable cybercriminals to rapidly generate and deploy large numbers of fraudulent webpages. Although surface-level attributes may differ across these websites, their underlying structures often exhibit significant similarities. However, most existing defenses rely on reactive blocklists or supervised classification models that focus on individual phishing instances, limiting their ability to identify structural reuse and detect coordinated phishing campaigns. To address this limitation, this study investigates whether HTML structure can serve as a robust fingerprint for identifying phishing template reuse. We model webpages as Document Object Model (DOM) trees and extract structural features, optionally enriched with HTML tag-based content information. These representations are then clustered using unsupervised learning methods to group structurally similar webpages. Three clustering algorithms are evaluated and compared, while also analyzing how the depth of the extracted DOM-tree affects cluster formation and overall clustering performance. Finally, cluster quality is also evaluated both quantitatively and qualitatively, including a novel level-wise Jaccard Distance Score and manual inspection supported by visualization tools. Results demonstrate that structural representations of webpages can effectively reveal hidden similarities across phishing sites, enabling the detection of emerging and zero-day templates and supporting the analysis of coordinated phishing threats
Abstract:Phishing remains a persistent and evolving cybersecurity threat, with attack volumes reaching record levels. This growth is driven by the industrialization of phishing through widely available phishing kits and reusable templates, which enable cybercriminals to rapidly generate and deploy large numbers of fraudulent webpages. Although surface-level attributes may differ across these websites, their underlying structures often exhibit significant similarities. However, most existing defenses rely on reactive blocklists or supervised classification models that focus on individual phishing instances, limiting their ability to identify structural reuse and detect coordinated phishing campaigns. To address this limitation, this study investigates whether HTML structure can serve as a robust fingerprint for identifying phishing template reuse. We model webpages as Document Object Model (DOM) trees and extract structural features, optionally enriched with HTML tag-based content information. These representations are then clustered using unsupervised learning methods to group structurally similar webpages. Three clustering algorithms are evaluated and compared, while also analyzing how the depth of the extracted DOM-tree affects cluster formation and overall clustering performance. Finally, cluster quality is also evaluated both quantitatively and qualitatively, including a novel level-wise Jaccard Distance Score and manual inspection supported by visualization tools. Results demonstrate that structural representations of webpages can effectively reveal hidden similarities across phishing sites, enabling the detection of emerging and zero-day templates and supporting the analysis of coordinated phishing threats
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Emerging Technologies (cs.ET)
arXiv:2608.16158 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.16158v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.16158 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 323 words
Related coverage

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 3, 2026

Article: Artificial Intelligence-Driven Phishing: How Phishing Technique Is Evolving and Implemented
InfoQ · Jun 8, 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026

Top 10 Best Active Directory Management Tools 2026
Cybersecurity News · Jul 26, 2026