aiqbench analysis
This research demonstrates that temporal patterns learned from diverse disease groups can effectively reconstruct transmission chains for new outbreaks without requiring target-specific refitting. The study also highlights significant unreliability in existing epidemiological links, showing that nearly half of published connections lack genomic support and directly impact source prioritization. These findings advance machine learning applications in public health by providing a robust, transferable prior for outbreak investigation.
A Transferable Learned Temporal Prior for Transmission Reconstruction and Decision-Relevant Uncertainty in Real Outbreak Labels
arXiv:2606.30842v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reconstructing who infected whom often relies on case timing and published transmission links. However, two important questions remain: can a temporal pattern learned from other diseases transfer to a new outbreak, and how reliable are the transmission links used as ground truth? We learned a temporal prior from eleven disease groups using logistic regression. The model was locked before any target-outbreak data were accessed and was then tested without refitting on 29 Andes virus (ANDV) parent-ranking tasks. The locked prior achieved a mean reciprocal rank (MRR) of 0.571, compared with 0.274 for the strongest fair source-trained temporal baseline (permutation p<0.001). Its Top-1 accuracy was 37.9%, compared with 13.8%. The MRR advantage remained significant unless 7-8 favorable task outcomes were reversed. We separately examined the reliability of published transmission links. Among 75 epidemiologically linked inter-host pairs from the 2022 New York City mpox outbreak, 54.67% were genomically unresolved or unsupported as direct transmission links (exact 95% CI: 42.75-66.21%). We also tested whether retaining uncertain transmission edges changed source prioritization. In ANDV and Guangdong Delta outbreak graphs, the top-5 priority sets changed, with Jaccard similarity ranging from 0.429 to 0.667. These results show that temporal information learned across diseases can provide a useful ranking signal without target-specific refitting. They also show that uncertainty in published transmission links can affect which source cases are prioritized for investigation.
Abstract:Reconstructing who infected whom often relies on case timing and published transmission links. However, two important questions remain: can a temporal pattern learned from other diseases transfer to a new outbreak, and how reliable are the transmission links used as ground truth? We learned a temporal prior from eleven disease groups using logistic regression. The model was locked before any target-outbreak data were accessed and was then tested without refitting on 29 Andes virus (ANDV) parent-ranking tasks. The locked prior achieved a mean reciprocal rank (MRR) of 0.571, compared with 0.274 for the strongest fair source-trained temporal baseline (permutation p<0.001). Its Top-1 accuracy was 37.9%, compared with 13.8%. The MRR advantage remained significant unless 7-8 favorable task outcomes were reversed. We separately examined the reliability of published transmission links. Among 75 epidemiologically linked inter-host pairs from the 2022 New York City mpox outbreak, 54.67% were genomically unresolved or unsupported as direct transmission links (exact 95% CI: 42.75-66.21%). We also tested whether retaining uncertain transmission edges changed source prioritization. In ANDV and Guangdong Delta outbreak graphs, the top-5 priority sets changed, with Jaccard similarity ranging from 0.429 to 0.667. These results show that temporal information learned across diseases can provide a useful ranking signal without target-specific refitting. They also show that uncertainty in published transmission links can affect which source cases are prioritized for investigation.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM)
arXiv:2606.30842 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2606.30842v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.30842 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 319 words