Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper reframes neural plasticity as a control theory problem, deriving exact bounds on the energy required to reach specific task targets under history-dependent dynamics. By introducing a task-conditioned adaptation cost and utilizing Wasserstein transport, it establishes a rigorous learning-retention frontier that challenges previous assumptions about capacity thresholds and volume monotonicity. The work provides critical mathematical tools for understanding the fundamental trade-offs between retaining past knowledge and adapting to new tasks in continual learning scenarios.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

A Thermodynamic Theory of Learning Part II: History-Dependent Reachability and Continual Learning

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2602.07950v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We formulate plasticity as target-dependent, finite-horizon reachability under history-dependent dynamics, using standard minimum-energy control theory. An extended state includes parameters and internal variables that affect future updates. Around a reference trajectory, the input-to-endpoint response and its controllability Gramian determine the minimum input energy for each reachable displacement. Minimizing this energy over the joint task target defines a task-conditioned adaptation cost, exact for the arbitrary-input linear model. A solvable learning-retention example shows that this cost can increase without any rank loss, and distinguishes small directional gain from an inaccessible direction. Wasserstein transport supplies a complementary global lower bound, while learning-map Jacobians describe deformation of initial perturbations rather than response to future inputs. The resulting learning-retention frontier depends on the current extended state, admissible updates, target, horizon, and cost metric; nonlinear and constrained-update applications require additional control of these modeling choices.

Abstract:We formulate plasticity as target-dependent, finite-horizon reachability under history-dependent dynamics, using standard minimum-energy control theory. An extended state includes parameters and internal variables that affect future updates. Around a reference trajectory, the input-to-endpoint response and its controllability Gramian determine the minimum input energy for each reachable displacement. Minimizing this energy over the joint task target defines a task-conditioned adaptation cost, exact for the arbitrary-input linear model. A solvable learning-retention example shows that this cost can increase without any rank loss, and distinguishes small directional gain from an inaccessible direction. Wasserstein transport supplies a complementary global lower bound, while learning-map Jacobians describe deformation of initial perturbations rather than response to future inputs. The resulting learning-retention frontier depends on the current extended state, admissible updates, target, horizon, and cost metric; nonlinear and constrained-update applications require additional control of these modeling choices.

13 pages. Part II of the series. Substantially revised: withdraws the earlier compatible capacity threshold, unconditional volume-monotonicity claim, and universal dissipation-to-forgetting inference; reformulates the analysis around history-dependent reachability and task-conditioned adaptation cost. Includes counterexamples, an exact learning-retention frontier

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2602.07950 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2602.07950v3 [cs.LG] for this version)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 188 words

Related coverage