aiqbench analysis
This theoretical framework establishes rigorous mathematical conditions under which activation patching and weight-space ablation yield consistent causal interpretations within transformer models. By proving exact results for idealized residual streams and validating them against synthetic tasks, the work clarifies fundamental discrepancies between forward-pass interventions and parameter-level modifications. These findings provide a critical foundation for understanding how low-rank ablations affect model behavior without relying on empirical heuristics alone.
A Theory of Conditional Collapse under Low-Rank Weight-Space Ablations: I. The Single-Block Theory and Synthetic Validation
arXiv:2608.03620v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Activation patching and weight-space ablation both claim a component is causally responsible for a behavior, yet they act on different objects: one forward pass versus the parameters behind every forward pass. We ask when they agree. We study an idealized model where a conditional computation is carried additively through a residual stream, $F(x)=F_0(x)+\sum_i\alpha_i(x)v_i$, read out by a linear functional, and prove three exact results. First, deleting a subset of carriers collapses a matched input pair onto the same unconditional output \emph{if and only if} the removal is symmetric on the pair and leaves no outside contrast; the error is deterministic, and we give its exact form even when the two conditions hold only approximately. Second, patching a carrier moves the readout by its donor-receiver \emph{contrast}, while ablating it moves the readout by its \emph{absolute level}; neither bounds the other, and we construct pairs where every single-carrier patch flips the decision while no single-carrier ablation does. Third, for an attention head composed with its own layer's normalization and MLP, we derive an exact first-order interaction formula with a provably second-order remainder, vanishing identically when only the MLP is ablated but not, in general, when a head is. Small transformers trained on a synthetic conditional task illustrate all three predictions: across thirty-nine ablation configurations the measured interaction is strongly rank-correlated with the idealized model's predictive accuracy (Spearman $-0.83$), and a second task and architecture reproduces the same pattern, including a further polarity reversal. The single-block interaction result extends past one residual block, and the synthetic validation is tested against a real pretrained model, in a companion paper that takes this theory further along both axes.
Title:A Theory of Conditional Collapse under Low-Rank Weight-Space Ablations: I. The Single-Block Theory and Synthetic Validation
Abstract:Activation patching and weight-space ablation both claim a component is causally responsible for a behavior, yet they act on different objects: one forward pass versus the parameters behind every forward pass. We ask when they agree. We study an idealized model where a conditional computation is carried additively through a residual stream, $F(x)=F_0(x)+\sum_i\alpha_i(x)v_i$, read out by a linear functional, and prove three exact results. First, deleting a subset of carriers collapses a matched input pair onto the same unconditional output \emph{if and only if} the removal is symmetric on the pair and leaves no outside contrast; the error is deterministic, and we give its exact form even when the two conditions hold only approximately. Second, patching a carrier moves the readout by its donor-receiver \emph{contrast}, while ablating it moves the readout by its \emph{absolute level}; neither bounds the other, and we construct pairs where every single-carrier patch flips the decision while no single-carrier ablation does. Third, for an attention head composed with its own layer's normalization and MLP, we derive an exact first-order interaction formula with a provably second-order remainder, vanishing identically when only the MLP is ablated but not, in general, when a head is. Small transformers trained on a synthetic conditional task illustrate all three predictions: across thirty-nine ablation configurations the measured interaction is strongly rank-correlated with the idealized model's predictive accuracy (Spearman $-0.83$), and a second task and architecture reproduces the same pattern, including a further polarity reversal. The single-block interaction result extends past one residual block, and the synthetic validation is tested against a real pretrained model, in a companion paper that takes this theory further along both axes.
25 pages, 2 figures. Part I of a two-part series; see the companion paper "Cross-Layer Interaction under Weight-Space Ablation" (Part II)
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.03620 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.03620v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.03620 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 407 words
Related coverage
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026
Cross-Layer Interaction under Weight-Space Ablation: A Closed-Form Attention Jacobian Bound and a Test on a Real Pretrained Model
arXiv · Aug 5, 2026

Reflections on unlearning and inoculation
LessWrong · Sep 20, 2026