Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This theoretical study advances the understanding of neural network generalization by mathematically characterizing how gradient descent with weight decay converges to global minimizers. By decomposing population error into data, optimization, and prediction variation components, the authors provide explicit bounds that explain phenomena like delayed generalization and grokking. Such rigorous analysis of training dynamics is essential for bridging the gap between empirical observations and fundamental learning theory.
Sources coveringarXiv, LessWrong, AI Alignment Forum, InfoQ
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

A Theoretical Analysis of Generalization Dynamics in Neural Networks under Gradient Descent with Weight Decay

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.07755v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Understanding generalization remains a central challenge in machine learning because it requires jointly considering data, architecture, and training dynamics. In this paper, we develop a theoretical framework that characterizes how these factors jointly shape generalization performance throughout training. More precisely, we study a broad class of neural networks trained under the $\ell^2$ loss by gradient descent (GD) with weight decay, and prove the convergence of GD to a neighbourhood of the global minimizers of the empirical loss. By partitioning the space based on the input data, we then decompose the population error into data error, optimization error, and prediction variation error, and bound them separately. In particular, for the prediction variation error, which measures the oscillations of the learned function, we propose (local) approximate homogeneity and derive explicit cellwise and layerwise bounds for its evolution along the training trajectory. These bounds yield two important implications: a necessary condition of improved generalization explains differences in layerwise generalization behavior; a sufficient condition describes delayed generalization and provides a theoretical characterization of grokking.

Abstract:Understanding generalization remains a central challenge in machine learning because it requires jointly considering data, architecture, and training dynamics. In this paper, we develop a theoretical framework that characterizes how these factors jointly shape generalization performance throughout training. More precisely, we study a broad class of neural networks trained under the $\ell^2$ loss by gradient descent (GD) with weight decay, and prove the convergence of GD to a neighbourhood of the global minimizers of the empirical loss. By partitioning the space based on the input data, we then decompose the population error into data error, optimization error, and prediction variation error, and bound them separately. In particular, for the prediction variation error, which measures the oscillations of the learned function, we propose (local) approximate homogeneity and derive explicit cellwise and layerwise bounds for its evolution along the training trajectory. These bounds yield two important implications: a necessary condition of improved generalization explains differences in layerwise generalization behavior; a sufficient condition describes delayed generalization and provides a theoretical characterization of grokking.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC)

arXiv:2609.07755 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.07755v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.07755 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 268 words

Related coverage