aiqbench analysis
This research systematically evaluates how different training objectives—such as Cross-Entropy, Prototype, and AP Losses—affect Out-of-Distribution detection performance in image classification models. The findings indicate that while several methods match standard accuracy, Cross-Entropy Loss consistently delivers the most reliable AUROC scores for distinguishing between near and far OOD samples under standardized protocols. This work provides essential guidance for practitioners deploying safety-critical AI systems where robustness against unseen data distributions is paramount.
A Systematic Comparison of Training Objectives for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Image Classification
arXiv:2603.07571v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is critical in safety-sensitive applications. While this challenge has been addressed from various perspectives, the influence of training objectives on OOD behavior remains comparatively underexplored. In this paper, we present a systematic comparison of four widely used training objectives: Cross-Entropy Loss, Prototype Loss, Triplet Loss, and Average Precision (AP) Loss, spanning probabilistic, prototype-based, metric-learning, and ranking-based supervision, for OOD detection in image classification under standardized OpenOOD protocols. Within the evaluated ResNet-18/OpenOOD setting and objective-specific OOD scoring rules, Cross-Entropy Loss, Prototype Loss, and AP Loss achieve comparable in-distribution accuracy, while Cross-Entropy Loss provides the most consistent near- and far-OOD AUROC overall; the other objectives can be competitive in specific settings.
Abstract:Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is critical in safety-sensitive applications. While this challenge has been addressed from various perspectives, the influence of training objectives on OOD behavior remains comparatively underexplored. In this paper, we present a systematic comparison of four widely used training objectives: Cross-Entropy Loss, Prototype Loss, Triplet Loss, and Average Precision (AP) Loss, spanning probabilistic, prototype-based, metric-learning, and ranking-based supervision, for OOD detection in image classification under standardized OpenOOD protocols. Within the evaluated ResNet-18/OpenOOD setting and objective-specific OOD scoring rules, Cross-Entropy Loss, Prototype Loss, and AP Loss achieve comparable in-distribution accuracy, while Cross-Entropy Loss provides the most consistent near- and far-OOD AUROC overall; the other objectives can be competitive in specific settings.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2603.07571 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2603.07571v3 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.07571 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 213 words
Related coverage

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Oct 3, 2026

Article: Governing AI in the Cloud: A Practical Guide for Architects
InfoQ · Jun 15, 2026

PRX Part 4: Our Data Strategy
Hugging Face · Jul 6, 2026
[AINews] AI Engineer NYC: Gemini 4 Argon, Vals AI Benchmarks
Latent Space · Oct 14, 2026