aiqbench analysis
This research introduces a systematic framework for selecting trajectory data points to augment, moving beyond naive random selection to improve spatio-temporal coherence in machine learning models. The study finds that strategies focusing on outlierness and uncertainty offer greater stability in sparse datasets but warns that augmentation can degrade performance in high-quality, dense environments. Ultimately, the value of data augmentation is strictly conditional on dataset density and domain-specific physical constraints, suggesting a need for tailored selection criteria rather than universal application.
A Systematic Approach for Selecting Trajectories for Data Augmentation
arXiv:2606.10938v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Trajectory data augmentation is a promising approach to mitigate data scarcity in machine learning applications, but its utility has been limited by the complexity of preserving spatio-temporal coherence. Although prior work demonstrated the viability of geometric perturbation, it relied on naive random selection, leaving a critical gap in understanding which trajectories should be augmented for maximal benefit. This thesis addresses this gap by developing a systematic and scalable framework to evaluate five systematic selection strategies: Outlierness, Diversity, Representativeness, Uncertainty, and Random selection. These strategies were rigorously tested across four datasets covering animal behavior (Foxes and Starkey), maritime traffic (AIS), and urban traffic (Car) using a suite of linear and non-linear machine learning models. As part of this evaluation, an Optuna-based hyperparameter optimization loop was integrated to empirically identify the best-performing augmentation parameters for each dataset within the explored search space. The results indicate that, while systematic selection is not a universal solution, it offers distinct advantages over the random baseline. Systematic strategies, particularly Outlierness and Uncertainty, demonstrated higher stability and were less prone to performance degradation observed with random sampling in dense datasets. However, the findings also reveal that the value of augmentation is strictly conditional. Visual analysis via UMAP demonstrates that while systematic augmentation successfully repairs topological fragmentation in sparse datasets, it can act as a corrupting noise signal in high-quality, dense datasets. Furthermore, the study identified physical limitations in high-velocity domains, where standard perturbation techniques lead to divergence in feature space...
Abstract:Trajectory data augmentation is a promising approach to mitigate data scarcity in machine learning applications, but its utility has been limited by the complexity of preserving spatio-temporal coherence. Although prior work demonstrated the viability of geometric perturbation, it relied on naive random selection, leaving a critical gap in understanding which trajectories should be augmented for maximal benefit. This thesis addresses this gap by developing a systematic and scalable framework to evaluate five systematic selection strategies: Outlierness, Diversity, Representativeness, Uncertainty, and Random selection. These strategies were rigorously tested across four datasets covering animal behavior (Foxes and Starkey), maritime traffic (AIS), and urban traffic (Car) using a suite of linear and non-linear machine learning models. As part of this evaluation, an Optuna-based hyperparameter optimization loop was integrated to empirically identify the best-performing augmentation parameters for each dataset within the explored search space. The results indicate that, while systematic selection is not a universal solution, it offers distinct advantages over the random baseline. Systematic strategies, particularly Outlierness and Uncertainty, demonstrated higher stability and were less prone to performance degradation observed with random sampling in dense datasets. However, the findings also reveal that the value of augmentation is strictly conditional. Visual analysis via UMAP demonstrates that while systematic augmentation successfully repairs topological fragmentation in sparse datasets, it can act as a corrupting noise signal in high-quality, dense datasets. Furthermore, the study identified physical limitations in high-velocity domains, where standard perturbation techniques lead to divergence in feature space...
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2606.10938 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2606.10938v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.10938 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 337 words
Related coverage
RESTA: Time-Scaling Augmentation for Data-Efficient Robot Imitation Learning
arXiv · Oct 14, 2026
Language Model Augmented Decision Transformer for Multi-Task Offline Reinforcement Learning
arXiv · Nov 5, 2026
GTA-RAG: Graph-Trajectory-Augmented Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Turn Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning
arXiv · Aug 25, 2026
Task-Aware Environment Augmentation for Reliable Navigation via Shielded Conditional Diffusion
arXiv · Jun 16, 2026