Skip to content
aiqbench takeChips & Infra

aiqbench analysis

This survey critically examines design methodologies essential for accelerating deep learning on heterogeneous hardware, covering the full stack from automated synthesis and domain-specific compilers to modeling and simulation. By addressing the multidisciplinary challenges of balancing parallelism with energy efficiency in HPC and edge platforms, it offers a clear roadmap for researchers navigating current technical bottlenecks in specialized accelerator development.
Sources coveringarXiv, SiliconANGLE, The Quantum Insider
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

A Survey on Design Methodologies for Accelerating Deep Learning on Heterogeneous Architectures

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2311.17815v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Given their increasing size and complexity, the need for efficient execution of deep neural networks has become increasingly pressing in the design of heterogeneous High-Performance Computing (HPC) and edge platforms, leading to a wide variety of proposals for specialized deep learning architectures and hardware accelerators. The design of such architectures and accelerators requires a multidisciplinary approach combining expertise from several areas, from machine learning to computer architecture, low-level hardware design, and approximate computing. Several methodologies and tools have been proposed to improve the process of designing accelerators for deep learning, aimed at maximizing parallelism and minimizing data movement to achieve high performance and energy efficiency. This paper critically reviews influential tools and design methodologies for Deep Learning accelerators, offering a wide perspective in this rapidly evolving field. This work complements surveys on architectures and accelerators by covering hardware-software co-design, automated synthesis, domain-specific compilers, design space exploration, modeling, and simulation, providing insights into technical challenges and open research directions.

Abstract:Given their increasing size and complexity, the need for efficient execution of deep neural networks has become increasingly pressing in the design of heterogeneous High-Performance Computing (HPC) and edge platforms, leading to a wide variety of proposals for specialized deep learning architectures and hardware accelerators. The design of such architectures and accelerators requires a multidisciplinary approach combining expertise from several areas, from machine learning to computer architecture, low-level hardware design, and approximate computing. Several methodologies and tools have been proposed to improve the process of designing accelerators for deep learning, aimed at maximizing parallelism and minimizing data movement to achieve high performance and energy efficiency. This paper critically reviews influential tools and design methodologies for Deep Learning accelerators, offering a wide perspective in this rapidly evolving field. This work complements surveys on architectures and accelerators by covering hardware-software co-design, automated synthesis, domain-specific compilers, design space exploration, modeling, and simulation, providing insights into technical challenges and open research directions.

Hardware Architecture (cs.AR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2311.17815 [cs.AR]

(or arXiv:2311.17815v3 [cs.AR] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.17815 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 253 words

Related coverage