Skip to content
aiqbench takeWritten by an AI model; may contain errors — check the source.AI Research

aiqbench analysis

This survey offers the first comprehensive review of deep multi-task learning (MTL) for connected autonomous vehicles, addressing the computational overhead and latency challenges inherent in traditional separate-model architectures. By categorizing existing approaches into ego-vehicle-only and V2X-enhanced cooperative paradigms, it provides a clear roadmap for optimizing resource utilization across perception, planning, and control domains. The analysis identifies critical research gaps in communication-centric MTL problems, setting a foundation for future developments in efficient, real-time autonomous navigation systems.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

A Survey on Deep Multi-Task Learning in Connected Autonomous Vehicles

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2508.00917v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Connected autonomous vehicles (CAVs) must simultaneously perform multiple tasks, such as perception, prediction, planning, and control, to ensure safe and reliable navigation in complex environments. Moreover, through vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication, cooperative perception and driving among CAVs can be enabled, thereby mitigating the limitations of individual vehicles, while it also introduces stringent latency, reliability, and bandwidth constraints. Traditionally, tasks are addressed using separate models, which leads to high deployment costs, increased computational overhead, and challenges in achieving real-time performance. Multi-task learning (MTL) has recently emerged as a promising solution that enables the joint learning of multiple tasks within a unified model. This offers improved efficiency and resource utilization. To the best of our knowledge, this survey is the first comprehensive review focusing on deep MTL in CAVs. We begin with an overview of CAVs and MTL to provide foundational background. Then, we review MTL approaches across key functional domains in CAVs, including perception, prediction, planning, control, as well as V2X communications and radio resource management (RRM). For the first four domains, we categorize existing works under ego vehicle-only (onboard-only) and V2X-enhanced cooperative (multi-agent) paradigms. We further discuss V2X communications and RRM as communication-centric MTL problems. Finally, we discuss the strengths and limitations of existing methods, identify key research gaps, and provide future research directions aimed at advancing MTL methodologies for CAV systems.

Abstract:Connected autonomous vehicles (CAVs) must simultaneously perform multiple tasks, such as perception, prediction, planning, and control, to ensure safe and reliable navigation in complex environments. Moreover, through vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication, cooperative perception and driving among CAVs can be enabled, thereby mitigating the limitations of individual vehicles, while it also introduces stringent latency, reliability, and bandwidth constraints. Traditionally, tasks are addressed using separate models, which leads to high deployment costs, increased computational overhead, and challenges in achieving real-time performance. Multi-task learning (MTL) has recently emerged as a promising solution that enables the joint learning of multiple tasks within a unified model. This offers improved efficiency and resource utilization. To the best of our knowledge, this survey is the first comprehensive review focusing on deep MTL in CAVs. We begin with an overview of CAVs and MTL to provide foundational background. Then, we review MTL approaches across key functional domains in CAVs, including perception, prediction, planning, control, as well as V2X communications and radio resource management (RRM). For the first four domains, we categorize existing works under ego vehicle-only (onboard-only) and V2X-enhanced cooperative (multi-agent) paradigms. We further discuss V2X communications and RRM as communication-centric MTL problems. Finally, we discuss the strengths and limitations of existing methods, identify key research gaps, and provide future research directions aimed at advancing MTL methodologies for CAV systems.

Robotics (cs.RO); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2508.00917 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2508.00917v2 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.00917 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2026.3699223 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 331 words

Related coverage