Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research establishes a unified taxonomy for over 1.2TB of LLM prompt data, revealing distinct lexical and syntactic patterns that differentiate prompts from general text. By proposing a lightweight 63-dimensional feature set extractable on CPUs, the study offers a practical method to reduce inference latency while maintaining high accuracy in routing and filtering tasks. These findings provide essential infrastructure for optimizing large-scale prompt processing pipelines without relying solely on computationally expensive GPU embeddings.
Sources coveringarXiv, MIT News
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

A Survey of LLM Prompt Datasets: Taxonomy, Linguistic Patterns, and Practical Uses

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2510.09316v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We compile 129 public LLM prompt datasets with more than 1.22TB and more than 673M instances and organize them into a unified taxonomy. We use seven datasets for detailed analysis and identify lexical, syntactic, and semantic patterns that distinguish prompts from general text. We evaluate these features in prompt filtering, source domain routing, and elicited response quality analysis. A 63 dimensional linguistic feature set that can be extracted on a CPU achieves over 91% of the F1 of GPU sentence embeddings and reduces latency per request by nearly half. In cross dataset routing, sentence embeddings reach 0.74 Macro-F1 and a structural feature subset reaches 0.61, compared with the chance level of 0.20. Structural routing features remain negatively associated with elicited response quality after prompt length is controlled on UltraFeedback. The apparent positive association of type to token ratio becomes much smaller under the same control. These findings support prompt processing pipelines that combine efficient structural features with robust semantic routing. Our catalogue, annotations, and code are given at https://github.com/ymzhang-cs/prompt-dataset-analysis.

Abstract:We compile 129 public LLM prompt datasets with more than 1.22TB and more than 673M instances and organize them into a unified taxonomy. We use seven datasets for detailed analysis and identify lexical, syntactic, and semantic patterns that distinguish prompts from general text. We evaluate these features in prompt filtering, source domain routing, and elicited response quality analysis. A 63 dimensional linguistic feature set that can be extracted on a CPU achieves over 91% of the F1 of GPU sentence embeddings and reduces latency per request by nearly half. In cross dataset routing, sentence embeddings reach 0.74 Macro-F1 and a structural feature subset reaches 0.61, compared with the chance level of 0.20. Structural routing features remain negatively associated with elicited response quality after prompt length is controlled on UltraFeedback. The apparent positive association of type to token ratio becomes much smaller under the same control. These findings support prompt processing pipelines that combine efficient structural features with robust semantic routing. Our catalogue, annotations, and code are given at this https URL.

Accepted to Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026. 30 pages

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2510.09316 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2510.09316v3 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.09316 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 280 words

Related coverage