aiqbench analysis
This survey consolidates recent advancements in feature engineering for black-box optimization, a critical subfield where machine learning automates algorithm selection and configuration without access to internal problem gradients. By categorizing features into landscape properties, trajectory data, and interaction metrics, the work provides an essential roadmap for researchers aiming to enhance solver efficiency through automated meta-learning techniques.
A Survey of Features Used for Representing Black-box Single-objective Continuous Optimization
arXiv:2406.06629v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: This survey examines key advancements in designing features to represent optimization problem instances, algorithm instances, and their interactions within the context of single-objective continuous black-box optimization. These features support machine learning tasks such as algorithm selection, algorithm configuration, and problem classification, and they are also used to evaluate the complementarity of benchmark problem sets. We provide a comprehensive overview of problem landscape features, algorithm features, high-level problem-algorithm interaction features, and trajectory features, including the latest works from the past five years. We also point out limitations of the current state-of-the-art and suggest directions for future research.
Abstract:This survey examines key advancements in designing features to represent optimization problem instances, algorithm instances, and their interactions within the context of single-objective continuous black-box optimization. These features support machine learning tasks such as algorithm selection, algorithm configuration, and problem classification, and they are also used to evaluate the complementarity of benchmark problem sets. We provide a comprehensive overview of problem landscape features, algorithm features, high-level problem-algorithm interaction features, and trajectory features, including the latest works from the past five years. We also point out limitations of the current state-of-the-art and suggest directions for future research.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Neural and Evolutionary Computing (cs.NE)
arXiv:2406.06629 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2406.06629v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.06629 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2026.102288 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 203 words
Related coverage

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026

Why I Left Google DeepMind
LessWrong · Jul 15, 2026

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026