Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This study validates the assumption that decoder performance rankings derived from synthetic noise models transfer to real hardware using Google's Willow processor, provided the noise model distinguishes error rates by operation type. The analysis reveals that NVIDIA's Ising pre-decoder offers no accuracy-latency advantage over other panel decoders when evaluated on code distances below its training receptive field. By releasing the full evaluation pipeline and per-shot outcomes, the authors enable direct comparison of future quantum error-correction strategies against real-device data.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

A Sim-to-Real Study of Surface-Code Decoder Benchmarking

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.04557v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Quantum error-correction decoders are typically benchmarked against synthetic circuit-level noise, under the assumption that a decoder's ranking under such noise transfers to hardware and improves as the noise model becomes more realistic. The Willow processor, the first to operate below the surface-code threshold, allows us to test this assumption. We rank a panel of six decoders using a four-rung ladder of noise models with increasing fidelity, evaluated against real data across three code distances, two bases, and fifteen round counts. Rank agreement with hardware appears once the noise model gives each operation type its own error rate. Calibrating the model to the device improves absolute error rates but not rank agreement. We additionally provide the first independent evaluation of NVIDIA's Ising pre-decoder on hardware, at code distances below its training receptive field and via a mapping onto the lattice on which it was trained. Under these conditions, it holds no accuracy-latency advantage: another panel decoder matches or improves on it in both per-cycle error rate and decode latency in 278 of the 280 evaluations. We release the full pipeline and the per-shot outcome of every evaluation, so future decoders and devices can be compared.

Abstract:Quantum error-correction decoders are typically benchmarked against synthetic circuit-level noise, under the assumption that a decoder's ranking under such noise transfers to hardware and improves as the noise model becomes more realistic. The Willow processor, the first to operate below the surface-code threshold, allows us to test this assumption. We rank a panel of six decoders using a four-rung ladder of noise models with increasing fidelity, evaluated against real data across three code distances, two bases, and fifteen round counts. Rank agreement with hardware appears once the noise model gives each operation type its own error rate. Calibrating the model to the device improves absolute error rates but not rank agreement. We additionally provide the first independent evaluation of NVIDIA's Ising pre-decoder on hardware, at code distances below its training receptive field and via a mapping onto the lattice on which it was trained. Under these conditions, it holds no accuracy-latency advantage: another panel decoder matches or improves on it in both per-cycle error rate and decode latency in 278 of the 280 evaluations. We release the full pipeline and the per-shot outcome of every evaluation, so future decoders and devices can be compared.

Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2609.04557 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2609.04557v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.04557 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 291 words

Related coverage