Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI & Society

aiqbench analysis

This paper proposes a semantic model for representing genetic evidence, aiming to bridge the gap between basic science research and clinical applications by creating an AI-ready data infrastructure. The study validates this framework through a human-AI pilot focused on clinical variant interpretation, demonstrating how structured data can enhance the reliability of genomic decision-making systems.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

A Semantic Model of Genetic Evidence: A Step Toward Bridging the Basic-Science-Clinic Gap

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.04509v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Scientific and clinical decision-making depends on evidence from the primary literature, but existing standards for representing that evidence (FHIR Evidence, ECO, SEPIO, and the GA4GH Genomic Knowledge Standards) are oriented toward clinical-trial workflows, evidence codes, or single-variant assertions, and do not capture the fine-grained, domain-specific structure of claims in basic and pre-clinical research. We introduce a semantic model for scientific evidence with three core classes, specialize it for genetics, align it structurally to FHIR Evidence with a SEPIO-anchored credibility decomposition, and attach a compact dimensional vocabulary whose conditional-activation rules are validated by a SHACL schema for the implemented constraints. Using clinical variant interpretation as the driving use case, we evaluate the model through a human-AI annotation pilot over six genetics papers, yielding 28 evidence items and 95 source-anchored assertions, with a workflow that keeps curator-authored reference annotations distinct from AI-drafted annotations. Treating the pilot as a feasibility study rather than a benchmark, we argue that the model is a useful increment toward trustworthy, AI-ready infrastructure for variant interpretation: a reference data model and validation schema for representing genetic evidence.

Abstract:Scientific and clinical decision-making depends on evidence from the primary literature, but existing standards for representing that evidence (FHIR Evidence, ECO, SEPIO, and the GA4GH Genomic Knowledge Standards) are oriented toward clinical-trial workflows, evidence codes, or single-variant assertions, and do not capture the fine-grained, domain-specific structure of claims in basic and pre-clinical research. We introduce a semantic model for scientific evidence with three core classes, specialize it for genetics, align it structurally to FHIR Evidence with a SEPIO-anchored credibility decomposition, and attach a compact dimensional vocabulary whose conditional-activation rules are validated by a SHACL schema for the implemented constraints. Using clinical variant interpretation as the driving use case, we evaluate the model through a human-AI annotation pilot over six genetics papers, yielding 28 evidence items and 95 source-anchored assertions, with a workflow that keeps curator-authored reference annotations distinct from AI-drafted annotations. Treating the pilot as a feasibility study rather than a benchmark, we argue that the model is a useful increment toward trustworthy, AI-ready infrastructure for variant interpretation: a reference data model and validation schema for representing genetic evidence.

16 pages; supplementary material (32 pages) included in this submission. Schema, annotations, and code: this https URL (archived at this https URL)

Databases (cs.DB); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Genomics (q-bio.GN)

H.2.1; I.2.4; J.3

arXiv:2609.04509 [cs.DB]

(or arXiv:2609.04509v1 [cs.DB] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.04509 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 302 words

Related coverage