Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This study identifies a universal scaling law where the influence of prior context in human language decays inversely with distance, a pattern confirmed across diverse corpora but absent in scrambled text or biological sequences. By using large language models as probes to isolate sequence arrangement effects, the research reveals that contextual persistence follows an exponent near 1, distributing linguistic influence uniformly across logarithmic timescales. This finding provides fundamental mathematical insight into how meaning is structured and maintained over varying distances in natural languages.
Sources coveringarXiv, Databricks
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

A scaling law of contextual persistence in human language

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2607.25184v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Human language exhibits lawful structure at the level of words (frequency, vocabulary growth) and word pairs (co-occurrence across distance). Here we show that the arrangement of words in sequence -- a central determinant of meaning -- obeys a comparable law. Using large language models as probabilistic probes, we measured the reduction in target perplexity conferred by prior context at distance d beyond that of the same words scrambled; this difference, the contextual persistence function P(d), isolates the influence of arrangement. Across ten corpora spanning six language families and written and spoken modalities, P(d) decayed approximately as 1/d ($P(d) \propto d^{-\alpha}$, mean $\alpha = 1.04$; median $r^2 = 0.96$). The effect vanished in scrambled and synthetic controls, replicated across independent probes, and did not appear in genomic or protein sequences under domain-native models. An exponent near 1 distributes contextual influence approximately uniformly across logarithmic timescales. The results establish a scaling law of contextual persistence in human language.

Abstract:Human language exhibits lawful structure at the level of words (frequency, vocabulary growth) and word pairs (co-occurrence across distance). Here we show that the arrangement of words in sequence -- a central determinant of meaning -- obeys a comparable law. Using large language models as probabilistic probes, we measured the reduction in target perplexity conferred by prior context at distance d beyond that of the same words scrambled; this difference, the contextual persistence function P(d), isolates the influence of arrangement. Across ten corpora spanning six language families and written and spoken modalities, P(d) decayed approximately as 1/d ($P(d) \propto d^{-\alpha}$, mean $\alpha = 1.04$; median $r^2 = 0.96$). The effect vanished in scrambled and synthetic controls, replicated across independent probes, and did not appear in genomic or protein sequences under domain-native models. An exponent near 1 distributes contextual influence approximately uniformly across logarithmic timescales. The results establish a scaling law of contextual persistence in human language.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2607.25184 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2607.25184v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.25184 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 251 words

Related coverage