aiqbench analysis
This study reveals how AI companion chatbots function as double-edged swords for teenagers, offering identity exploration and emotional support while simultaneously fostering problematic attachment and social displacement. The research underscores that even with full knowledge of the AI's artificial nature, users experience genuine distress regarding privacy, unwanted role drift, and service interruptions, highlighting critical safety gaps in current relational AI design.
A Responsive Present, a Shared Past, a Social Other: Teens' Overreliance on Companion AI Chatbots
arXiv:2609.14843v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI companions provide socially engaging interaction through availability, personalization, memory, roleplay, and emotionally responsive language. For teens, these systems may support sensitive self-disclosure, identity exploration, and relationship rehearsal while shaping intimacy expectations, offline relationships, emotional wellbeing, and self-understanding. We analyzed 17,053 verified quotations from 3,930 teen-relevant Reddit posts using thematic analysis. We identified 53 topics across seven thematic groups. Users described AI companions as sources of comfort, recognition, identity exploration, and relationship rehearsal, but also reported problematic attachment, social substitution, emotional dependence, and disruption to academic and social life. Roleplay, memory, perceived reciprocity, unwanted romantic or sexual role drift, privacy concerns, platform changes, and service interruptions shaped users' boundaries and control. Awareness that the AI was artificial did not prevent guilt, obligation, grief, or distress. These findings show that companion-AI safety must address relationships over time through user-controlled memory, privacy, relational boundaries, and healthy disengagement.
Abstract:AI companions provide socially engaging interaction through availability, personalization, memory, roleplay, and emotionally responsive language. For teens, these systems may support sensitive self-disclosure, identity exploration, and relationship rehearsal while shaping intimacy expectations, offline relationships, emotional wellbeing, and self-understanding. We analyzed 17,053 verified quotations from 3,930 teen-relevant Reddit posts using thematic analysis. We identified 53 topics across seven thematic groups. Users described AI companions as sources of comfort, recognition, identity exploration, and relationship rehearsal, but also reported problematic attachment, social substitution, emotional dependence, and disruption to academic and social life. Roleplay, memory, perceived reciprocity, unwanted romantic or sexual role drift, privacy concerns, platform changes, and service interruptions shaped users' boundaries and control. Awareness that the AI was artificial did not prevent guilt, obligation, grief, or distress. These findings show that companion-AI safety must address relationships over time through user-controlled memory, privacy, relational boundaries, and healthy disengagement.
Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
H.3.3; H.5.2; J.4
arXiv:2609.14843 [cs.HC]
(or arXiv:2609.14843v1 [cs.HC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.14843 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 245 words
Related coverage

Sen. Adam Schiff on AI regulation, free speech, and impeaching Trump one more time
The Verge · Oct 5, 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026
Links #3: 2026/06 Part 1
LessWrong · Jun 15, 2026

What The Social Reckoning gets right — and wrong
The Verge · Oct 7, 2026