A Regulatory Placebo? The Systemic Failure of Mandatory GenAI Labeling

Title:A Regulatory Placebo? The Systemic Failure of Mandatory GenAI Labeling

Abstract:We examine the worldwide trend of mandatory labeling of generative artificial intelligence(GenAI) as a reactive, symbolic form of legislation triggered by technological panic and institutional responses. From a technical perspective, this study demonstrates that current mandatory labeling not only creates implementation dilemmas but also risks hindering the evolutionary trajectory of AI technology. We then systematically analyze the three dominant theoretical strands of this regime, the value dilution theory, the information authenticity theory, and the proactive regulation theory, and find that they are products of regulators' cognitive limitations in understanding the logic of modern technology. Not only do such formalistic compliance requirements become a regulatory placebo, but they also obscure the genuine legal demands of the technological era. This challenges the current governance paradigm and suggests a shift from identity-label governance to content governance, with an urgent need to address the complex problems associated with GenAI.

Computers and Society (cs.CY); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2608.16470 [cs.CY]

(or arXiv:2608.16470v1 [cs.CY] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.16470 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.