aiqbench analysis
This paper provides a rigorous mathematical proof of Shor's conjecture regarding optimal quantum measurements, establishing conditions under which posterior algebras yield information-maximal outcomes for binary ensembles. By validating the framework across hundreds of mixed-state instances, it advances fundamental limits on how classical data can be extracted from quantum systems without collapsing coherence unnecessarily. The work deepens our theoretical understanding of quantum measurement theory and its implications for high-fidelity quantum readout protocols.
A Proof of Shor's Orthogonal-Measurement Conjecture and the Structure of Information-Optimal Quantum Measurements
arXiv:2609.27992v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Which quantum measurement extracts the most classical information from an ensemble? We introduce the posterior algebra, a new canonical operator algebra selected by mutual information. For faithful ensembles, an affine information bound is exact precisely when this algebra is commutative; its joint spectral measurement is then optimal, and every optimal finite POVM refines it. Binary ensembles have one generator; compactness covers singular states, giving a proof of Shor's finite-dimensional binary orthogonal-measurement conjecture. The framework also gives rigidity bounds and a certified posterior-spectral receiver, validated on 408 mixed-state instances.
Abstract:Which quantum measurement extracts the most classical information from an ensemble? We introduce the posterior algebra, a new canonical operator algebra selected by mutual information. For faithful ensembles, an affine information bound is exact precisely when this algebra is commutative; its joint spectral measurement is then optimal, and every optimal finite POVM refines it. Binary ensembles have one generator; compactness covers singular states, giving a proof of Shor's finite-dimensional binary orthogonal-measurement conjecture. The framework also gives rigidity bounds and a certified posterior-spectral receiver, validated on 408 mixed-state instances.
11 pages, 1 figure. This work was already publicly available on Zenodo by 13 August 2026, prior to this arXiv submission: this https URL
arXiv:2609.27992 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.27992v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.27992 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
binary_stress_benchmark.csv
binary_stress_benchmark_summary.json
expected/finite_iterate_transport.json
expected/posterior_examples.json
finite_iterate_transport.py
plot_binary_solver_profile.py
posterior_examples.py
(3 additional files not shown) You must enabled JavaScript to view entire file list.
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 224 words
Related coverage

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 15, 2026

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026

What is Quantum Error Correction? Complete 2026 Beginner’s Guide
Quantum Zeitgeist · May 29, 2026
A Mike's-Eye View of ARC's Research
AI Alignment Forum · Jun 9, 2026