aiqbench analysis
This paper establishes the definitive joint lower bound $\Omega(\kappa\sqrt{s}\log(1/\varepsilon))$ for sparse quantum linear system solvers, confirming long-standing conjectures regarding the simultaneous dependence on condition number, sparsity, and precision. By closing this theoretical gap, the work solidifies the fundamental complexity limits for key quantum primitives used in optimization and machine learning applications.
A Near-Optimal Joint Lower Bound for Sparse Quantum Linear System Solvers
arXiv:2609.22445v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Quantum linear system solvers form one of the central algorithmic primitives in quantum computing, with applications ranging from differential equations and optimization to machine learning. Their cost is commonly measured through query complexity, which counts the number of oracle calls needed to access the input matrix. In the sparse-access model, this complexity is governed by three parameters: the condition number $\kappa$, the sparsity $s$ of the input matrix, and the target precision $\varepsilon$. The dependence on $\kappa$ and $\varepsilon$ is already well understood through the lower bound $\Omega(\kappa\log(1/\varepsilon))$, which matches the best known scaling in these parameters. Once the sparsity $s$ is included, however, the expected lower bound has long been conjectured to be $\Omega(\kappa\sqrt{s}\log(1/\varepsilon))$. Recent work by Mori et al. [Quantum Sci. Tech. 11 035063 (2026)] made an important step towards this goal by establishing the lower bound $\Omega(\kappa\sqrt{s})$ for constant error $\varepsilon$. In this work, we complete the picture and prove the full joint lower bound $\Omega(\kappa\sqrt{s}\log(1/\varepsilon))$ in the sparse-access model, thereby establishing the anticipated dependence on all three parameters simultaneously.
Abstract:Quantum linear system solvers form one of the central algorithmic primitives in quantum computing, with applications ranging from differential equations and optimization to machine learning. Their cost is commonly measured through query complexity, which counts the number of oracle calls needed to access the input matrix. In the sparse-access model, this complexity is governed by three parameters: the condition number $\kappa$, the sparsity $s$ of the input matrix, and the target precision $\varepsilon$. The dependence on $\kappa$ and $\varepsilon$ is already well understood through the lower bound $\Omega(\kappa\log(1/\varepsilon))$, which matches the best known scaling in these parameters. Once the sparsity $s$ is included, however, the expected lower bound has long been conjectured to be $\Omega(\kappa\sqrt{s}\log(1/\varepsilon))$. Recent work by Mori et al. [Quantum Sci. Tech. 11 035063 (2026)] made an important step towards this goal by establishing the lower bound $\Omega(\kappa\sqrt{s})$ for constant error $\varepsilon$. In this work, we complete the picture and prove the full joint lower bound $\Omega(\kappa\sqrt{s}\log(1/\varepsilon))$ in the sparse-access model, thereby establishing the anticipated dependence on all three parameters simultaneously.
arXiv:2609.22445 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.22445v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22445 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 264 words
Related coverage

Sparse quantum state preparation with improved Toffoli cost
Quantum Journal · Sep 10, 2026

Measurement incompatibility in Bayesian multiparameter quantum estimation
Quantum Journal · Aug 13, 2026
Root-sparsity scaling for Hamiltonian simulation, differential equations and linear-system solvers
arXiv · Oct 5, 2026

GEM Training: How Meta Doubled the Efficiency of Its LLM-Scale Ads Foundation Model
Meta Engineering · Aug 3, 2026