aiqbench analysis
This paper applies tabular foundation models and symbolic regression to a large, audited corpus of soil compaction tests, demonstrating how machine learning can extract reliable density and moisture content baselines from heterogeneous engineering data. By validating predictions against physical constraints like the zero-air-voids line, the work establishes a robust framework for screening geotechnical materials without relying on limited historical correlations.
A Large Open Multi-Energy Corpus of Soil Compaction Tests, with Machine-Learning Baselines
arXiv:2609.03337v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Every engineered fill is specified by a maximum dry density and an optimum moisture content. Each determination needs a full Proctor test. Published correlations rest on one to four hundred specimens, usually from one laboratory at one compactive energy, and are seldom released. This paper releases a corpus without those limits. It holds 2,854 laboratory compaction tests from six public sources, across 162 provenance groups and four Proctor energy levels, with fines from 1.5 to 100%. Every record is audited to the Proctor method its source names, and no energy is inferred. Screening on the zero-air-voids condition removed 11.8% of harmonised records, and 5.7% of those with a measured specific gravity. A material share of published compaction data is physically impossible. The optimum degree of saturation over the corpus is 0.815 at a coefficient of variation of 11%. That is a baseline, not a constant. Both parameters are then estimated from one classification suite and the compaction standard. A tabular foundation model reaches R2 0.824 for density and 0.784 for water content under random folds. It reaches 0.727 and 0.696 with folds drawn around provenance, and 0.520 and 0.614 with a whole source held out. Compactive energy is negligible marginally yet decisive conditionally. Density on the 66 modified-Proctor records is predicted at R2 0.740 with it and -0.651 without. Symbolic regression yields closed forms coupled through a phase relation. No predicted pair can then exceed the zero-air-voids line. The predictions are for screening, not acceptance.
Abstract:Every engineered fill is specified by a maximum dry density and an optimum moisture content. Each determination needs a full Proctor test. Published correlations rest on one to four hundred specimens, usually from one laboratory at one compactive energy, and are seldom released. This paper releases a corpus without those limits. It holds 2,854 laboratory compaction tests from six public sources, across 162 provenance groups and four Proctor energy levels, with fines from 1.5 to 100%. Every record is audited to the Proctor method its source names, and no energy is inferred. Screening on the zero-air-voids condition removed 11.8% of harmonised records, and 5.7% of those with a measured specific gravity. A material share of published compaction data is physically impossible. The optimum degree of saturation over the corpus is 0.815 at a coefficient of variation of 11%. That is a baseline, not a constant. Both parameters are then estimated from one classification suite and the compaction standard. A tabular foundation model reaches R2 0.824 for density and 0.784 for water content under random folds. It reaches 0.727 and 0.696 with folds drawn around provenance, and 0.520 and 0.614 with a whole source held out. Compactive energy is negligible marginally yet decisive conditionally. Density on the 66 modified-Proctor records is predicted at R2 0.740 with it and -0.651 without. Symbolic regression yields closed forms coupled through a phase relation. No predicted pair can then exceed the zero-air-voids line. The predictions are for screening, not acceptance.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.03337 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.03337v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.03337 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 339 words
